| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 2007;38:2415.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Department of Society, Human Development, and Health (M.M.G., L.F.B.), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; the Department of Epidemiology (M.M.G.), Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University, New York, NY; and the Department of Public Health (M.A.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Correspondence to M. Maria Glymour, 722 W 168th St, Room 1603, New York, NY 10032. E-mail mglymour{at}hsph.harvard.edu
Background and Purpose— Most Stroke Belt studies define exposure based on residence at stroke onset. We assessed whether residence in the Stroke Belt during childhood confers extra stroke risk in adulthood, even among people who left the region.
Methods— Stroke-free Health and Retirement Study participants (n=18 070) followed up (average, 8.4 years) for first stroke (1452 events) were classified as living in 1 of 7 Stroke Belt states in childhood or at study enrollment (average age, 63 years). We used Cox proportional-hazards models to compare stroke risk for people who had never lived in the Stroke Belt with those who had lived there at both ages, in childhood only, or in adulthood only.
Results— Compared with never having lived in the Stroke Belt, the hazard ratio for Stroke Belt residence in both childhood and adulthood was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.06, 1.43) and for Stroke Belt residence in childhood only was 1.25 (95% CI, 1.02, 1.55). Stroke Belt residence at enrollment but not during childhood was not significantly related to stroke risk (hazard ratio=1.01; 95% CI, 0.70, 1.46), but the small sample in this group resulted in wide CIs. Results changed little after risk factor adjustment, including comprehensive adult socioeconomic measures. Subgroup analyses found similar patterns by sex and birth cohort. In contrast, blacks who had lived in the Stroke Belt in childhood only did not appear to have significantly elevated stroke risk compared with blacks who had never lived in the Stroke Belt.
Conclusions— The excess stroke risk for people who had lived in Stroke Belt states during childhood implicates early life exposures in the etiology of the Stroke Belt.
Key Words: cerebrovascular disorders early-life environment epidemiology geography life span Stroke Belt
Related Article:
Stroke 2007 38: 2403-2404.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Glymour and M. Avendano Can Self-Reported Strokes Be Used to Study Stroke Incidence and Risk Factors?: Evidence From the Health and Retirement Study Stroke, March 1, 2009; 40(3): 873 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Lyons, A. G. Rudd, and C. Alvaro Advances in Health Policy 2007 Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 264 - 267. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. El-Saed and L. H. Kuller Is the Stroke Belt Worn From Childhood?: Current Knowledge and Future Directions Stroke, September 1, 2007; 38(9): 2403 - 2404. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |