This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 38/9/2556    most recent STROKEAHA.107.484857v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Menon-Nair, A. Articles by Ogourtsova, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Menon-Nair, A. Articles by Ogourtsova, T. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Related Collections Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2007;38:2556.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Occupational Therapists’ Identification, Assessment, and Treatment of Unilateral Spatial Neglect During Stroke Rehabilitation in Canada

Anita Menon-Nair, MSc; Nicol Korner-Bitensky, PhD Tatiana Ogourtsova, BSc

From the Department of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (A.M.-N.), University of Toronto, Toronto, and the School of Physical and Occupational Therapy (N.K.-B., T.O.), McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Correspondence to Nicol Korner-Bitensky, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3630 Promenades Sir William Osler, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1Y5, Canada. E-mail nicol.korner-bitensky{at}mcgill.ca

Background and Purpose— Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is a disabling feature of stroke, and its identification and management are critical for optimizing patient outcomes. This study examined USN problem identification, assessment, and treatment among clinicians working in stroke rehabilitation.

Methods— This report was based on a Canada-wide survey of 253 occupational therapists providing inpatient stroke rehabilitation.

Results— Eighty percent (n=202) recognized USN as a potential problem, 27% (n=67) reported using standardized USN assessment tools, and 58% (n=147) indicated using USN interventions. Working on a stroke unit and younger age were among the variables explaining 7% to 19% of the variability in USN problem identification, assessment, and intervention use.

Conclusions— Although USN problem identification was high, clinicians were unlikely to use standardized assessment tools or evidence-based interventions to effectively manage this serious impairment.

Key Words: assessment • best practice • detection • intervention • stroke • unilateral spatial neglect