Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2008;39:e151
Published online before print August 28, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.527333
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/10/e151    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.527333v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zicari, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dotti, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zicari, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dotti, M. T.

(Stroke. 2008;39:e151.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Response to Letter by Mazzucco et al

Enza Zicari, MD

Department of Neurological and Behavioural Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

Rossana Tassi, MD

Department of Neurosciences, AOUS, Siena, Italy

Nicola De Stefano, MD Maria Teresa Dotti, MD

Department of Neurological and Behavioural Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy


An extract of the first 100% of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Response:

We thank Mazzucco and coworkers for their interesting comments. Unfortunately, we were not aware of their study1 because this was reported only in an abstract format and does not appear in the web-based scientific databases.

We do agree with them that the transesophageal echocardiograhy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of patent foramen ovale (PFO), but this is a quite invasive procedure that should be avoided in a research study. Thus, we decided to use the transcranial Doppler in our study. Interestingly, one of the authors of the letter sent by Mazzucco et al seems to agree with us, as he previously2 stated: "In the hot debate on PFO, transcranial Doppler merits a place not less than transesophageal echocardiography... It is therefore surprising that PFO assessment with transcranial Doppler is systematically neglected." It might be of interest, however, that 2 of the subgroups of our patients with large right-to-left shunt did undergo transesophageal echocardiograhy for clinical reasons and this showed the presence of PFO.

As for genotype-phenotype relation, the hypothesis of Marzucco and coworkers that Arg141Cys mutation could be related with right-to-left shunt due to PFO is intriguing. Unfortunately, none of the patients included in our study carried the Arg141Cys mutation.

Disclosures

None.

1. Mazzucco S, Anzola GP, Ferrarini M, Olivato S, Taioli F, Rizzuto N, Fabrizi GM. CADASIL, migraine and patent foramen ovale. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007; 23 (suppl 1): 50–51.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Anzola GP. Transcranial Doppler: cinderella in the assessment of patent foramen ovale in stroke patients. Stroke. 2004; 35: e137.[Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. Mazzucco, G. P. Anzola, and N. Rizzuto
Methodological Issues in Right-to-Left Shunt Detection in CADASIL Patients
Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): e509 - e509.
[Full Text] [PDF]