Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2008;39:1240-1245
Published online before print February 21, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.498279
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/4/1240    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.498279v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke
Right arrow Behavioral Changes and Stroke

(Stroke. 2008;39:1240.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Predictors of Emotional Distress After Stroke

Shirley A. Thomas, PhD Nadina B. Lincoln, PhD

From the Division of Rehabilitation & Ageing (S.A.T.) and the Institute of Work, Health, & Organizations (N.B.L.), University of Nottingham, UK.

Correspondence to Shirley Thomas, Division of Rehabilitation & Ageing, University of Nottingham, B Floor Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. E-mail shirley.thomas{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Background and Purpose— The aim of this prospective longitudinal study was to identify factors relating to emotional distress in the first 6 months after stroke in a sample including patients with aphasia.

Methods— One hundred patients who were in hospital at 1 month after stroke were recruited and assessed on measures of communication impairment (Sheffield Screening Test), personal activities of daily living (Barthel Index), and emotional distress (Visual Analogue Self-Esteem Scale). Demographic and stroke characteristics were recorded. Patients (n=92) were reassessed on the same measures 6 months after stroke, in addition to assessing extended activities of daily living (Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale).

Results— Patients were aged 44 to 86 years (51 men), and 21 were classified as having aphasia. Multiple linear regression showed that expressive communication impairment and dependence in personal activities of daily living were significant predictors of emotional distress at 1 month after stroke (R2=24%). Expressive communication impairment, emotional distress at 1 month after stroke, and having a more severe stroke were significant predictors of emotional distress at 6 months after stroke (R2=55%). Distress levels were similar at 1 month and 6 months after stroke. Demographic characteristics and side of lesion were unrelated to distress.

Conclusions— Expressive communication impairment and level of disability in personal activities of daily living were related to distress. Distress was persistent in the first 6 months after stroke. Appropriate treatment strategies need to be developed and evaluated for patients who have communication impairments.


Key Words: mood disorder • depression • stroke • aphasia • rehabilitation