Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2008;39:1456-1463
Published online before print March 6, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.498600
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/5/1456    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.498600v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arenillas, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Montaner, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arenillas, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Montaner, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Brain Circulation and Metabolism
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.
Right arrow Primary and Secondary Stroke Prevention

(Stroke. 2008;39:1456.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Progression of Symptomatic Intracranial Large Artery Atherosclerosis Is Associated With a Proinflammatory State and Impaired Fibrinolysis

Juan F. Arenillas, MD, PhD; José Álvarez-Sabín, MD, PhD; Carlos A. Molina, MD, PhD; Pilar Chacón, MD, PhD; Israel Fernández-Cadenas, PhD; Marc Ribó, MD, PhD; Pilar Delgado, MD, PhD; Marta Rubiera, MD, PhD; Anna Penalba; Alex Rovira, MD Joan Montaner, MD, PhD

From Neurovascular Unit (J.A.-S., C.A.M., M.R., M.Rubiera) and Neurovascular Research Laboratory (I.F.-C., P.D., A.P., J.M.), Department of Neurology; Lipid Research Unit (P.C.), Department of Biochemistry; Magnetic Resonance Unit (A.R.), Department of Neuroradiology, Vall d’Hebron Universitary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Neurovascular Unit (J.F.A.), Department of Neurosciences, Germans Trias i Pujol Universitary Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain.

Correspondence to Juan F. Arenillas Lara, Stroke Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Germans Trias i Pujol Universitary Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Carretera de Canyet sn, 08916 Badalona, Barcelona, Spain. E-mail juanfarenillas{at}terra.es

Background and Purpose— The molecular pathways involved in the progression of intracranial large artery atherosclerosis (ILA) are largely unknown. Our objective was to prospectively study the relationship between circulating levels of inflammatory markers and fibrinolysis inhibitors, and the risk of progression of symptomatic ILA.

Methods— Seventy-five consecutive patients with first-ever symptomatic intracranial atherostenosis were studied. Blood levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), E-selectin, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, matrix metalloproteinases 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, and 13, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and lipoprotein(a) were measured 3 months after the qualifying stroke or transient ischemic attack. Thereafter, patients underwent long-term transcranial Doppler follow-up to detect progression of ILA.

Results— During a median follow-up time of 23 months, 25 (33%) patients showed ILA progression. Multivariable adjusted Cox regression models and Kaplan–Meier curves showed that high baseline level of CRP, E-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, matrix metalloproteinase 9, PAI-1, and lipoprotein(a) predicted ILA progression independently of vascular risk factors. Of them, only CRP (CRP>5.5 mg/L; HR, 5.4 [2.3 to 12.7]; P=0.0001) and PAI-1 (PAI-1>23.1 ng/mL; HR, 2.4 [1.0 to 5.8]; P=0.05) predicted ILA progression also independently of the other studied molecules.

Conclusion— Progression of symptomatic ILA is associated with a proinflammatory state, as reflected by high levels of inflammatory markers, and with defective fibrinolysis, as indicated by raised concentrations of endogenous fibrinolysis inhibitors.


Key Words: fibrinolysis • inflammation • intracranial atherosclerosis • intracranial stenosis • progression