This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 39/5/1520    most recent STROKEAHA.107.502229v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gauthier, L. V. Articles by Uswatte, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gauthier, L. V. Articles by Uswatte, G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Related Collections Behavioral/psychosocial - treatment Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation Behavioral Changes and Stroke Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2008;39:1520.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Remodeling the Brain

Plastic Structural Brain Changes Produced by Different Motor Therapies After Stroke

Lynne V. Gauthier, MA; Edward Taub, PhD; Christi Perkins, BS; Magdalene Ortmann; Victor W. Mark, MD Gitendra Uswatte, PhD

From Department of Psychology (L.V.G., E.T. C.P., M.O., G.U.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (V.W.M.), and Department of Physical Therapy (G.U.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala.

Correspondence to Lynne V. Gauthier, Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, CPM 720, 1530 3^rd Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35294. E-mail lynnevg{at}uab.edu

Background and Purpose— Studies on adult stroke patients have demonstrated functional changes in cortical excitability, metabolic rate, or blood flow after motor therapy, measures that can fluctuate rapidly over time. This study evaluated whether evidence could also be found for structural brain changes during an efficacious rehabilitation program.

Methods— Chronic stroke patients were randomly assigned to receive either constraint-induced movement therapy (n=16) or a comparison therapy (n=20). Longitudinal voxel-based morphometry was performed on structural MRI scans obtained immediately before and after patients received therapy.

Results— The group receiving constraint-induced movement therapy exhibited far greater improvement in use of the more affected arm in the life situation than the comparison therapy group. Structural brain changes paralleled these improvements in spontaneous use of the more impaired arm for activities of daily living. There were profuse increases in gray matter in sensory and motor areas both contralateral and ipsilateral to the affected arm that were bilaterally symmetrical, as well as bilaterally in the hippocampus. In contrast, the comparison therapy group failed to show gray matter increases. Importantly, the magnitude of the observed gray matter increases was significantly correlated with amount of improvement in real-world arm use.

Conclusions— These findings suggest that a previously overlooked type of brain plasticity, structural remodeling of the human brain, is harnessed by constraint-induced movement therapy for a condition once thought to be refractory to treatment: motor deficit in chronic stroke patients.

Supplemental Material

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X. Wang, M. Gerken, M. Dennis, R. Mooney, J. Kane, S. Khuder, H. Xie, W. Bauer, A. V. Apkarian, and J. Wall Profiles of Precentral and Postcentral Cortical Mean Thicknesses in Individual Subjects over Acute and Subacute Time-Scales Cereb Cortex, October 13, 2009; (2009) bhp226v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Ellis, T. Sukal-Moulton, and J. P. A. Dewald Progressive Shoulder Abduction Loading is a Crucial Element of Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2009; 23(8): 862 - 869. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. V. Gauthier, E. Taub, V. W. Mark, C. Perkins, and G. Uswatte Improvement After Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Is Independent of Infarct Location in Chronic Stroke Patients * Supplemental Methods Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2468 - 2472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Charles Invited Commentary Physical Therapy, June 1, 2009; 89(6): 542 - 544. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. B. Plow, J. R. Carey, R. J. Nudo, and A. Pascual-Leone Invasive Cortical Stimulation to Promote Recovery of Function After Stroke: A Critical Appraisal Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): 1926 - 1931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]