This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 40/12/3777    most recent STROKEAHA.109.561431v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Nogueira, R. G. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nogueira, R. G. Related Collections Acute Cerebral Infarction Thrombolysis Other Stroke Treatment - Surgical

(Stroke. 2009;40:3777.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Predictors of Good Clinical Outcomes, Mortality, and Successful Revascularization in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Thrombectomy

Pooled Analysis of the Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI) and Multi MERCI Trials

Raul G. Nogueira, MD; David S. Liebeskind, MD; Gene Sung, MD; Gary Duckwiler, MD; Wade S. Smith, MD, PhD on Behalf of the MERCI; and Multi MERCI Writing Committee

From Departments of Neurology and Interventional Neuroradiology (R.G.N.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Department of Neurology (D.S.L., W.S.S.), University of California, Los Angeles, Calif; Department of Neurology (G.S.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif; Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (G.D.), University of California, Los Angeles, Calif.

Correspondence to Raul G. Nogueira, MD, Department of Interventional Neuroradiology & Endovascular Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55, Fruit St, GRB-2-241, Boston, MA, 02114. E-mail rnogueira{at}partners.org

Background and Purpose— The Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia (MERCI) and Multi MERCI trials evaluated the safety and efficacy of thrombectomy in the treatment of intracranial arterial occlusions within 8 hours of symptom onset. We sought to determine the predictors of clinical and angiographic outcomes in these patients.

Methods— The trial cohorts were combined in a data set of 305 patients. Twenty-eight baseline variables were included in univariate and multivariate analyses to define the independent predictors of good outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score 2), mortality, and successful revascularization (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Ischemia 2 to 3 flow).

Results— In the univariate analysis, final revascularization, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, age, and systolic blood pressure were associated with both good outcomes and mortality at 90 days (P<0.0018 for all). In the multivariate analysis, final revascularization (OR, 20.4; 95% CI, 7.7 to 53.9; P<0.0001), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.92; P<0.0001), and age (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95 to 0.98; P=0.0004) were independent predictors of good outcome. Final revascularization (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.50; P<0.0001), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.14; P=0.0001), age (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.07; P<0.0001), and internal carotid artery occlusion (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.22 to 3.86; P=0.0084) were the strongest predictors of mortality. Systolic blood pressure (<150 versus 150 mm Hg; OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.70; P=0.0007) and M2 occlusion (OR, 3.86; 95% CI, 1.28 to 11.67; P=0.0168) were independent predictors of revascularization.

Conclusion— Final recanalization status represents the strongest predictor of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing thrombectomy. The ability to remove the clot is negatively influenced by systolic blood pressure on presentation perhaps because of the hydraulic forces imposed by higher blood pressures. Although internal carotid artery occlusions are associated with increased mortality, they do not appear to influence the chances of good outcomes. This finding supports the inclusion of internal carotid artery occlusions in future efficacy trials.

Key Words: acute stroke • endovascular treatment • thrombectomy