Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2009;40:545-550
Published online before print December 24, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.528497
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/2/545    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.528497v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rinehart, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Haaland, K. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rinehart, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Haaland, K. Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction

(Stroke. 2009;40:545.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Arm Use After Left or Right Hemiparesis Is Influenced by Hand Preference

Jenny K. Rinehart, MS; Rena D. Singleton, BS; John C. Adair, MD; Joseph R. Sadek, PhD Kathleen Y. Haaland, PhD

From the New Mexico Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (J.K.R., R.D.S., J.C.A., J.R.S., K.Y.H.) and the Departments of Psychiatry (J.R.S., K.Y.H.), Neurology (J.C.A., K.Y.H.), and Psychology (J.K.R.), University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.

Correspondence to Kathleen Y. Haaland, PhD, Research Service (151), New Mexico VA Healthcare System, 1501 San Pedro SE, Albuquerque, NM 87108. E-mail khaaland{at}unm.edu

Background and Purpose— Despite strong evidence for hand preference and its impact on motor performance, its influence on stroke rehabilitation has not been routinely considered. Previous research demonstrates that patients with hemiparetic stroke use their ipsilesional, nonparetic arm 5 to 6 times more frequently than their paretic arm, but it is unknown if such use varies with laterality of hemiparesis. The purpose of our study was to determine if the right arm is used more frequently in right-handed patients with stroke.

Methods— We assessed relative use of the right, left, and both arms with wrist accelerometers on patients with unilateral, paretic stroke matched for degree of paresis (12 with right hemisphere damage, 17 with left hemisphere damage) and 25 neurologically intact control participants as they performed the Arm Motor Ability Test.

Results— We showed: (1) ipsilesional arm use was greater after right hemisphere damage than left hemisphere damage; (2) the left hemisphere damage group used both arms together more often than the right hemisphere damage group but less often than the control group; and (3) both stroke groups used their contralesional, paretic arm to the same degree.

Conclusions— These findings emphasize the influence of hand preference on arm use after stroke for the ipsilesional but not the contralesional arm. Although both stroke groups used their ipsilesional more than their contralesional arm, the difference was greater for the right hemisphere damage group who used their ipsilesional arm 4 times more frequently than their contralesional arm, whereas the left hemisphere damage group used their ipsilesional arm 2 times more frequently than their contralesional arm.


Key Words: functional laterality • paresis • psychomotor performance • rehabilitation • stroke