This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 40/3/754    most recent STROKEAHA.108.531285v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Frendl, D. M. Articles by Goldstein, L. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Frendl, D. M. Articles by Goldstein, L. B. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Emergency Medical Services Stroke Related Collections Health policy and outcome research Emergency treatment of Stroke

(Stroke. 2009;40:754.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Lack of Impact of Paramedic Training and Use of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale on Stroke Patient Identification and On-Scene Time

Daniel M. Frendl, BA, EMT-B; David G. Strauss, BA, EMT-I; B. Kevin Underhill, EMT-P Larry B. Goldstein, MD, FAAN, FAHA

From Duke University (D.M.F.), Durham, NC; Duke University School of Medicine (D.G.S.), Durham, NC; Durham County Emergency Medical Services (B.K.U.), Durham, NC; and the Department of Medicine (Neurology; L.B.G.), Duke Stroke Center, Center for Clinical Health Policy Research, Duke University and Durham VAMC, Durham, NC.

Correspondence to Larry B. Goldstein, MD, Box 3651, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail golds004{at}mc.duke.edu

Background and Purpose— The Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) is recommended for emergency medical services use in identifying patients with stroke. Data evaluating its performance in the field are limited. We assessed the impact of training and use of the CPSS on the accuracy of paramedics’ stroke patient identification and on-scene time.

Methods— A 1-hour interactive educational presentation on the use of the CPSS was conducted for paramedics transporting patients to an academic medical center. Patients with stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) were identified retrospectively from paramedic records and were compared with the hospital’s prospective stroke registry for the year before and after the training.

Results— There were 154 patients with suspected stroke/transient ischemic attack identified (56% women, 53% white, 44% black, mean age 67±16 years). There was no difference in paramedics’ use of the CPSS (37.5% versus 23.8%, P=0.123) or accuracy of stroke/TIA patient identification (40.5% versus 38.9%, P=0.859) before and after training. Of responsive patients identified by paramedics as having a stroke/TIA, 57% had an abnormality in at least one CPSS item with no effect on on-scene time (17±6 minutes with a normal versus 18±6 minutes with an abnormal CPSS, P=0.492). Those with a final diagnosis of stroke/TIA (n=61, 40%) more frequently had at least one abnormal CPSS item (70% versus 30%, P=0.008, sensitivity 0.71, specificity 0.52) with 49% of patients with an abnormality having a discharge diagnosis of stroke/TIA.

Conclusions— Paramedic training in the CPSS, or its use, had no impact on the accuracy of their identification of patients with stroke/TIA or on-scene time.

Key Words: diagnosis • emergency services • stroke