Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2009;40:853-858
Published online before print January 22, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.532499
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/3/853    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.532499v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fridriksson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rorden, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fridriksson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rorden, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow Behavioral Changes and Stroke
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Medical

(Stroke. 2009;40:853.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Treating Visual Speech Perception to Improve Speech Production in Nonfluent Aphasia

Julius Fridriksson, PhD; Julie M. Baker, MA; Janet Whiteside, PhD; David Eoute, Jr, MSP; Dana Moser, PhD; Roumen Vesselinov, PhD Chris Rorden, PhD

From the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders (J.F., J.M.B., D.E., D.M., C.R.), Department of Statistics (R.V.), University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC; Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders (J.W.), University of Central Florida, Orlando, Fla.

Correspondence to Julius Fridriksson, PhD, Associate Professor, Dept. of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208. E-mail jfridrik{at}sc.edu

Background and Purpose— Several recent studies have revealed modulation of the left frontal lobe speech areas not only during speech production but also for speech perception. Crucially, the frontal lobe areas highlighted in these studies are the same ones that are involved in nonfluent aphasia. Based on these findings, this study examined the utility of targeting visual speech perception to improve speech production in nonfluent aphasia.

Methods— Ten patients with chronic nonfluent aphasia underwent computerized language treatment utilizing picture–word matching. To examine the effect of visual speech perception on picture naming, 2 treatment phases were compared—one that included matching pictures to heard words and another in which pictures were matched to heard words accompanied by a video of the speaker’s mouth presented on the computer screen.

Results— The results revealed significantly improved picture naming of both trained and untrained items after treatment when it included a visual speech component (ie, seeing the speaker’s mouth). In contrast, the treatment phase in which pictures were only matched to heard words did not result in statistically significant improvement of picture naming.

Conclusions— The findings suggest that focusing on visual speech perception can significantly improve speech production in nonfluent aphasia and may provide an alternative approach to treat a disorder in which speech production seldom improves much in the chronic phase of stroke.


Key Words: aphasia • speech disorders • stroke recovery • therapy • treatment