This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 40/4/1105    most recent STROKEAHA.108.532218v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by de Weerd, M. Articles by Bots, M. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by de Weerd, M. Articles by Bots, M. L. Related Collections Carotid Stenosis

(Stroke. 2009;40:1105.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Go Red for Women

Prevalence of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis According to Age and Sex

Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis

Marjolein de Weerd, MSc; Jacoba P. Greving, PhD; Anne W.F. de Jong, MSc; Erik Buskens, MD, PhD Michiel L. Bots, MD, PhD

From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.d.W., J.P.G., A.W.F.d.J., M.L.B.), University Medical Center Utrecht, and Department of Epidemiology (E.B.), University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to Jacoba P. Greving, PhD, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal Mail Str 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail J.P.Greving{at}umcutrecht.nl

Background and Purpose— In the discussion on the value of population-wide screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS), reliable prevalence estimates are crucial. We set out to provide reliable age- and sex-specific prevalence estimates of ACAS through a systematic literature review and meta-regression analysis.

Methods— We searched PubMed and EmBase until December 2007 for studies that reported the prevalence of ACAS in a population free of symptomatic carotid artery disease. Data were extracted with use of a standardized form on participants’ characteristics, assessment method, study quality, and prevalence estimates for moderate (50% stenosis) and severe (70% stenosis) ACAS. Metaregression was used to investigate sources of heterogeneity.

Results— Forty studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was considerable variation among studies with respect to demographics, methods of grading stenosis, and stenosis cutoff point used. The pooled prevalence of moderate stenosis was 4.2% (95% CI, 3.1% to 5.7%). Prevalence of moderate stenosis among people age <70 years was 4.8% (95% CI, 3.1% to 7.3%) in men and 2.2% (95% CI, 0.9% to 4.9%) in women. Among those 70 years, prevalence increased to 12.5% (95% CI, 7.4% to 20.3%) in men and to 6.9% (95% CI, 4.0% to 11.5%) in women. Metaregression showed that both age and sex significantly affected the prevalence of moderate stenosis. No contribution of study size, publication year, geographic region, assessment method, and study quality was found. The pooled prevalence of severe stenosis was 1.7% (95% CI, 0.7% to 3.9%).

Conclusions— Prevalence of moderate stenosis increases with age in both men and women, but men at all ages have the higher prevalence estimates. The number of studies that allowed meaningful data synthesis of severe stenosis was limited.

Key Words: asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis • prevalence • systematic review • metaregression analysis