Stroke. 2009;40:e98-e99
Published online before print February 26, 2009,
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.519553
(Stroke. 2009;40:e98.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Repetitive Task Training for Improving Functional Ability After Stroke
Beverley French, PhD;
Lois H. Thomas, PhD;
Michael J. Leathley, PhD;
Christopher J. Sutton, PhD, CStat;
Joanna McAdam, BA;
Anne Forster, PhD;
Peter Langhorne, PhD;
Christopher I.M. Price, PhD;
Andrew Walker, PhD
Caroline L. Watkins, PhD
From the Department of Nursing (B.F., L.H.T., M.J.L., J.M., C.L.W.), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK; the Lancashire School of Health and Postgraduate Medicine (C.J.S.), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK; the Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation (A.F.), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; the Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine (P.L.) and Health Economics (A.W.), University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; and Elderly Services (C.I.M.P.), Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, North Shields.
Correspondence to Beverley French, PhD, Senior Research Fellow, Department of Nursing, University of Central Lancashire, Brook 434, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK. E-mail bfrench1@uclan.ac.uk
Graeme J. Hankey MD, FRCP Section Editor
Key Words: exercise functional recovery rehabilitation stroke care therapy
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
|
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
The inclusion of active practice of task-specific motor activities
is popular in therapy approaches to stroke rehabilitation.
 |
Objectives
|
|---|
The objective of this review was to determine if repetitive
task training after stroke improves global, upper, or lower
limb function and if treatment effects are influenced by the
amount, type, or timing of practice.
 |
Search Strategy
|
|---|
We searched the Cochrane Stroke Trials Register (to October
2006); The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED,
SportDiscus, Science Citation Index, Index to Theses, ZETOC,
PEDro, and OT Seeker (all to September 2006); and OT search
(to March 2006). We also searched for unpublished/non-English
language trials; combed conference proceedings and reference
lists; requested information on bulletin boards; and contacted
trial authors.
 |
Selection Criteria
|
|---|
Selection criteria included randomized/quasirandomized trials
in adults after stroke, of interventions that included an active
motor sequence performed repetitively within a single training
session, a clear functional goal, and a quantifiable level of
practice.
 |
Data Collection and Analysis
|
|---|
Two authors independently screened abstracts, extracted data,
and appraised trial quality. Further information was obtained
from study authors. Results from individual trials were combined
using meta-analytic techniques appropriate to the data extracted
and the level of between-trial heterogeneity.
 |
Main Results
|
|---|
Fourteen trials with 17 intervention-control pairs and 659 participants
were included. Primary outcomes showed that treatment effects
were statistically significant for walking distance (see the
Figure); walking speed (standardized mean difference, 0.29;
95% CI, 0.04 to 0.53); and sit-to-stand (standardized effect
estimate, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.56). Treatment effects were
of borderline statistical significance for functional ambulation
(standardized mean difference, 0.25; 95% CI,
. . . [Full Text of this Article]