Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2009;40:e348-e365
Published online before print February 26, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.527580
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/5/e348    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.527580v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schumacher, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wechsler, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schumacher, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wechsler, L. R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Angioplasty
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Stroke Syndromes
Right arrow Angiography
Right arrow Primary and Secondary Stroke Prevention
Right arrow Angioplasty and Stenting

(Stroke. 2009;40:e348.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Special Reports

Reporting Standards for Angioplasty and Stent-Assisted Angioplasty for Intracranial Atherosclerosis

H. Christian Schumacher, MD; Philip M. Meyers, MD, FAHA; Randall T. Higashida, MD; Colin P. Derdeyn, MD; Sean D. Lavine, MD; Gary M. Nesbit, MD; David Sacks, MD; Peter Rasmussen, MD Lawrence R. Wechsler, MD

From the Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Division of Vascular Neurology and Neurocritical Care (H.C.S.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons (P.M.M., S.D.L.), Neurological Institute of New York, NY; University of California (R.T.H.), San Francisco; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (C.P.D.), Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo; Oregon Health and Science University (G.M.N.), Portland; Advanced Interventional Radiology (D.S.), Reading Hospital and Medical Center, Reading, Pa; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (L.R.W.), Pa; and Cleveland Clinic Foundation (P.R.), Ohio.

Correspondence to Philip M. Meyers, MD, FAHA, Associate Professor, Radiology and Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Clinical Director, Neuroendovascular Service, New York Presbyterian–Columbia Neurological Institute, New York, NY 10032. E-mail pmm2002{at}columbia.edu

Background and Purpose— Intracranial cerebral atherosclerosis causes ischemic stroke in a significant number of patients. Technological advances over the past 10 years have enabled endovascular treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. The number of patients treated with angioplasty or stent-assisted angioplasty for this condition is increasing. Given the lack of universally accepted definitions, the goal of this document is to provide consensus recommendations for reporting standards, terminology, and written definitions when reporting clinical and radiological evaluation, technique, and outcome of endovascular treatment using angioplasty or stent-assisted angioplasty for stenotic and occlusive intracranial atherosclerosis.

Summary of Report— This article was written under the auspices of Joint Writing Group of the Technology Assessment Committee, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society of Interventional Radiology; Joint Section on Cerebrovascular Neurosurgery of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons; and the Section of Stroke and Interventional Neurology of the American Academy of Neurology. A computerized search of the National Library of Medicine database of literature (PubMed) from January 1997 to December 2007 was conducted with the goal to identify published endovascular cerebrovascular interventional data in stenotic intracranial atherosclerosis that could be used as benchmarks for quality assessment. We sought to identify those risk adjustment variables that affect the likelihood of success and complications. This document offers the rationale for different clinical and technical considerations that may be important during the design of clinical trials for endovascular treatment of intracranial stenotic and occlusive atherosclerosis. Included in this guidance document are suggestions for uniform reporting standards for such trials. These definitions and standards are primarily intended for research purposes; however, they should also be helpful in clinical practice and applicable to all publications.

Conclusion— In summary, the definitions proposed represent recommendations for constructing useful research data sets. The intent is to facilitate production of scientifically rigorous results capable of reliable comparisons between and among similar studies. In some cases, the definitions contained here are recommended by consensus of a panel of experts in this writing group for consistency in reporting and publication. These definitions should allow different groups to publish results that are directly comparable.


Key Words: anatomy • angiography • interventional neuroradiology • neuroradiology • reporting standard • reporting terminology • stenting