Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2009;40:2092-2097
Published online before print April 23, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.544783
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/6/2092    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.544783v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Jovin, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Jovin, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Thrombolysis
Right arrow Angioplasty and Stenting

(Stroke. 2009;40:2092.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Mechanical Approaches Combined With Intra-Arterial Pharmacological Therapy Are Associated With Higher Recanalization Rates Than Either Intervention Alone in Revascularization of Acute Carotid Terminus Occlusion

Ridwan Lin, MD, PhD; Nirav Vora, MD; Syed Zaidi, MD; Aitziber Aleu, MD; Brian Jankowitz, MD; Ajith Thomas, MD; Rishi Gupta, MD; Michael Horowitz, MD; Susan Kim, CRNP; Vivek Reddy, MD; Maxim Hammer, MD; Ken Uchino, MD; Lawrence R. Wechsler, MD Tudor Jovin, MD

From the Stroke Institute (R.L., S.Z., A.A., S.K., V.R., M.H., K.U., L.R.W., T.J.), Department of Neurosurgery (B.J., M.H.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa; Department of Neurosurgery (A.T.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Souers Stroke Institute (N.V.), Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Mo; Cerebrovascular Center (R.G.), Cleveland Clinic, Ohio.

Correspondence to Tudor G. Jovin, MD, Center for Neuroendovascular Therapy, Assistant Professor of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UPMC stroke Institute, Suite C-424, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. E-mail jovintg{at}upmc.edu

Background and Purpose— Acute stroke attributable to internal carotid artery terminus occlusion carries a poor prognosis. Vessel recanalization is crucial to improve clinical outcome. Historically, pharmacological thrombolysis alone has low recanalization rates. We sought to determine whether adjunctive mechanical approaches achieve better vessel recanalization and functional outcome.

Methods— We retrospectively reviewed 75 consecutive endovascular cases of acute internal carotid artery terminus occlusions treated at our center between 1998 and 2008. Mechanical approaches (MERCI retrieval/angioplasty/stent) with and without adjunctive intra-arterial pharmacological therapy (urokinase or tissue plasminogen activator) was compared to intra-arterial lytics alone. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors of recanalization (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grades 2 to 3) and favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin score ≤2) at 3 months.

Results— Lowest recanalization rates were observed with intra-arterial lytics alone (3/17, 17.6%). MERCI embolectomy combined with intra-arterial lytics was associated with the highest recanalization rates (18/21, 85.7%; P<0.0001). MERCI embolectomy alone achieved 46.2% recanalization rates (6/13; P=0.23). Angioplasty or stenting and intra-arterial lytics achieved 25% (2/8; P=0.65) and 40% (4/10; P=0.085) recanalization, respectively. In multivariate analysis, combination of MERCI embolectomy with intra-arterial lytics (OR, 16.2; CI, 4.6–77.6), or any mechanical technique with intra-arterial lytics (OR, 6.7; CI, 2.5–19.5) independently predicted thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 2 to 3 recanalization. Clinically significant parenchymal hemorrhage rates were 7.5% with combination (3/38) and 12.5% with pharmacological therapies (2/16; P=0.46). Using stepwise logistic regression, age (OR, 0.95; CI, 0.90–0.995), baseline NIHSS (OR, 0.82; CI, 0.70–0.96), and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 2 to 3 recanalization (OR, 4.0; CI, 1.1–14.4) were associated with favorable functional outcome.

Conclusions— Combined mechanical and intra-arterial pharmacological therapy is associated with higher recanalization rates than either intervention alone in acute internal carotid artery terminus occlusion revascularization.


Key Words: carotid terminus • intra-arterial • mechanical