This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 40/6/e451    most recent STROKEAHA.108.528430v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bailey, E. L. Articles by Wardlaw, J. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bailey, E. L. Articles by Wardlaw, J. M. Related Collections Animal models of human disease Ischemic biology - basic studies Cerebral Lacunes Other Vascular biology

(Stroke. 2009;40:e451.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Comments, Opinions, and Reviews

Potential Animal Models of Lacunar Stroke

A Systematic Review

Emma L. Bailey, BSc; James McCulloch, PhD; Cathie Sudlow, MRCP, PhD Joanna M. Wardlaw, FRCR, FMedSci

From the Division of Clinical Neuroscience (E.L.B., C.S., J.M.W.), Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; and the Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (J.C.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Correspondence to Prof Joanna M. Wardlaw, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK. E-mail joanna.wardlaw{at}ed.ac.uk

Background and Purpose— Lacunar ischemic stroke accounts for 25% of all ischemic strokes, but the exact etiology is unknown. Numerous pathophysiologies have been proposed, including atheroma and endothelial dysfunction. Models of any of these pathological features would aid understanding of the etiology and help develop treatments for lacunar stroke. We therefore aimed to assess the relevance of all available potential animal models of lacunar stroke.

Methods— We systematically reviewed the published literature for animal models that could represent lacunar stroke using validated search strategies. We included studies that could represent an aspect of lacunar stroke as well as those aiming to model conditions with potentially similar pathology and extracted data on species, induction method, and resulting brain and vessel lesions.

Results— From 5670 papers, 41 studies (46 papers) met inclusion criteria representing over 10 different classes of stroke induction. Important data like infarct size and animal numbers were often missing. Many models’ infarcts were too large or affected the cortex. Emboli mostly caused cortical but not small subcortical lesions. Most models focused on creating ischemic lesions in brain tissue. Only one (spontaneous lesions in spontaneously hypertensive stroke-prone rats) also mimicked small vessel pathology. Here, the precursor to small vessel and brain damage was blood–brain barrier failure.

Conclusion— Some animal models produce small subcortical infarcts, but few mimic the human small vessel pathology. Models of small vessel disease could help improve understanding of human lacunar disease, particularly to clarify factors associated with the small vessel morphological changes preceding brain damage. Much lacunar stroke may arise after blood–brain barrier disruption.

Key Words: emboli • experimental model • fibrinoid necrosis • lacunar stroke • stroke • subcortical