This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 40/7/2468    most recent STROKEAHA.109.548347v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Gauthier, L. V. Articles by Uswatte, G. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gauthier, L. V. Articles by Uswatte, G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Related Collections CT and MRI Behavioral Changes and Stroke Rehabilitation, Stroke Other Stroke Treatment - Medical

(Stroke. 2009;40:2468.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Improvement After Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Is Independent of Infarct Location in Chronic Stroke Patients

Lynne V. Gauthier, MA; Edward Taub, PhD; Victor W. Mark, MD; Christi Perkins, BS Gitendra Uswatte, PhD

From the Department of Psychology (L.V.G., E.T., C.P., G.U.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (V.W.M.), Department of Physical Therapy (G.U.), University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Correspondence to Lynne V. Gauthier, Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, CPM 720, 1530 3rd Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35294. E-mail lynnevg{at}uab.edu

Background and Purpose— Disruption of the corticospinal tract at various locations in the brain has been shown to predict worse spontaneous motor recovery after stroke. However, the anatomic specificity of previous findings was limited by the categorical classification of infarct locations. Here we used computational methods to more precisely determine the specific anatomic locations associated with impaired motor ability. More important, however, our study also used these techniques to evaluate whether infarct location could influence motor outcomes after Constraint-Induced Movement therapy (CI therapy), a specific and controlled form of physical therapy.

Methods— Quantitative voxel-based analyses were used to determine whether infarct location could predict either initial motor ability or clinical improvement after CI therapy in chronic stroke patients.

Results— Although corona radiata infarcts were associated with worse in-laboratory motor ability at pretreatment, infarct location did not predict improvement in either the laboratory or the life situation after CI therapy.

Conclusions— The extent of improvement from CI therapy does not depend on the location of neurological damage, despite there being a pretreatment relationship between infarct location and in-laboratory motor ability. This dissociation could be explained by brain plasticity induced by CI therapy.

Supplemental Methods