Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2009;40:3113-3120
Published online before print June 18, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.555789
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the course for this article:
Stroke: September 2009, Volume 40, Number 9
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/9/3113    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.555789v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minnerup, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wellmann, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minnerup, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wellmann, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Neuroprotectors

(Stroke. 2009;40:3113.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

The Efficacy of Erythropoietin and Its Analogues in Animal Stroke Models

A Meta-Analysis

Jens Minnerup, MD; Jan Heidrich, MD, MSc; Andreas Rogalewski, MD; Wolf-Rüdiger Schäbitz, MD Jürgen Wellmann, PhD

From the Department of Neurology (J.M., A.R., W.-R.S.) and the Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine (J.H., J.W.), University of Münster, Germany.

Correspondence to Wolf-Rüdiger Schäbitz, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Albert-Schweitzer-Strasse 33, 48149 Münster, and Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld, Germany. E-mail: wolf.schaebitz{at}evbk.de

Background and Purpose— Erythropoietin (EPO) was explored regarding its suitability as a candidate stroke drug in animal experimental studies. We performed a meta-analysis to obtain an overall impression of the efficacy of EPO in published animal experimental stroke studies and for potential guidance of future clinical studies.

Methods— By electronic and manual searches of the literature, we identified studies describing the efficacy of EPO in experimental focal cerebral ischemia. Data on study quality, EPO dose, time of administration, and outcome measured as infarct volume or functional deficit were extracted. Data from all studies were pooled by means of a meta-analysis.

Results— Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. When administered after the onset of ischemia, EPO and its analogues reduced infarct size by 32% and improved neurobehavioral deficits significantly. A meta-regression suggests higher doses of EPO to be associated with smaller infarct volumes. When administered earlier than 6 hours EPO was more effective compared to a later treatment initiation. Both hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic EPO analogues showed efficacy in experimental stroke.

Conclusion— In conclusion, this analysis further strengthens confidence in the efficacy of EPO and its analogues in stroke therapy. Nonhematopoietic EPO analogues which are known to have less systemic adverse effects compared to EPO are also promising candidate stroke drugs. Further experimental studies are required that evaluate the safety of a combination of EPO with thrombolysis and whether EPO is also effective in animals with comorbidity.


Key Words: stroke • erythropoietin • meta-analysis