Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on August 2, 2007

Stroke. 2007
Published online before print August 2, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.477133
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/9/2459    most recent
STROKEAHA.106.477133v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baruch, L.
Right arrow Articles by Zabalgoitia, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baruch, L.
Right arrow Articles by Zabalgoitia, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Atrial Fibrillation
*Blood Thinners
*Stroke
Hazardous Substances DB
*WARFARIN
Related Collections
Right arrow Coumarins
Right arrow Other anticoagulants
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrow Anticoagulants
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on November 2, 2006
Revised on February 26, 2007
Accepted on February 28, 2007

Can Patients at Elevated Risk of Stroke Treated With Anticoagulants Be Further Risk Stratified?

Lawrence Baruch MD*; Brian F. Gage MD; Jay Horrow MD; Steen Juul-Möller MD; Arthur Labovitz MD; Maria Persson MS; and Miguel Zabalgoitia MD

From the Department of Medicine (L.B.), Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, and the Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; the Department of Medicine (B.F.G.), Washington University, St. Louis, Mo; AstraZeneca LP (J.H.), Wilmington, Del; Department of Cardiology (S.J.-M.), University Hospital Malmö, University of Lund, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Medicine (A.L.), St. Louis University, St. Louis, Mo; AstraZeneca R&D Mölndal (M.P.), Mölndal, Sweden; and the University of Texas Health Science Center (M.Z.), San Antonio, Tex.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: baruchlarry{at}att.net.

Background and Purpose—Patients with atrial fibrillation have a varied risk of stroke, depending on age and comorbid conditions. The objective of this study was to assess the predictive value of stroke risk classification schemes and to identify patients with atrial fibrillation who are at substantial risk of stroke despite optimal anticoagulant therapy.

Methods—Seven recognized classification schemes—the American College of Chest Physicians 2001, American College of Chest Physicians 2004, Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SPAF), Atrial Fibrillation Investigators, Framingham, van Walraven, and CHADS2—were compared for their ability to predict ischemic stroke in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy. Data came from the Stroke Prevention using an ORal Thrombin Inhibitor in atrial Fibrillation III and V trials, which compared the efficacy of adjusted-dose warfarin and the direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran (36 mg twice daily) in preventing thromboembolic events in 7329 patients with chronic or paroxysmal nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were at moderate or high risk of ischemic stroke. The main outcome measure was ischemic stroke, as determined by a central event adjudication committee.

Results—During 11 245 patient-years of follow-up, 159 patients had an ischemic stroke (1.4%/year). As indicated by c statistics and hazard ratios, 3 of the classification schemes predicted stroke significantly better than chance: Framingham (c=0.64), CHADS2 (c=0.65), and SPAF (c=0.61).

Conclusions—In a large cohort of atrial fibrillation patients at moderate or high risk of ischemic stroke treated with warfarin or ximelagatran, the CHADS2, SPAF, and Framingham schemes had greater predictive accuracy than chance. This predictive ability may allow clinicians to target high-risk patients for more aggressive intervention.


Key words: anticoagulation • atrial fibrillation • direct thrombin inhibitors • risk prediction • stroke


Related Article:

Predicting Stroke Risk in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Daniel G. Hackam
Stroke 2007 38: 2409. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Y.H. Lip
The Balance Between Stroke Prevention and Bleeding Risk in Atrial Fibrillation: A Delicate Balance Revisited
Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1406 - 1408.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. S. Taggar, T. Watson, and G. Y.H. Lip
Can Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Be Optimally Risk Stratified for Stroke and Thromboembolism?
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): e24 - e25.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. Baruch, B. Gage, and J. Horrow
Response to Letter by Taggar et al
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): e26 - e26.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. G. Hackam
Predicting Stroke Risk in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Stroke, September 1, 2007; 38(9): 2409 - 2409.
[Full Text] [PDF]