Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on April 26, 2007

Stroke. 2007
Published online before print April 26, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.478230
A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/6/1843    most recent
STROKEAHA.106.478230v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lampl, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Oron, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lampl, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Oron, U.
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Emergency treatment of Stroke
Right arrow Neuroprotectors

Submitted on November 20, 2006
Revised on January 11, 2007
Accepted on January 11, 2007

Infrared Laser Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: A New Treatment Strategy. Results of the NeuroThera Effectiveness and Safety Trial-1 (NEST-1)

Yair Lampl MD; Justin A. Zivin MD, PhD; Marc Fisher MD; Robert Lew PhD; Lennart Welin MD; Bjorn Dahlof MD; Peter Borenstein MD; Bjorn Andersson MD; Julio Perez MD; Cesar Caparo MD; Sanja Ilic MD, MS*; and Uri Oron PhD

From the Wolfson Medical Center (Y.L.), Department of Neurology, Holon, Israel; the University of California San Diego (J.Z.), Department of Neurosciences, La Jolla, Calif; the University of Massachusetts Medical Center (M.F.), Worchester, Mass; the MAVERIC Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (R.L), Boston, Mass; the Lidkoping Hospital (L.W.), Department of Medicine, Lidkoping, Sweden; the Ostra University Hospital (B.D.), Department of Medicine, University of Goteborg, Sweden; the SÁS/Skene Iasarett (B.A.), Department of Medicine, Skene, Sweden; the Sahlgrenska University Hospital (J.P.), Department of Medicine, University of Goteborg, Sweden; the Hospital National "Dos de Mayo" (C.C.), Parque de La Medicina Peruana S/N; Cercado-Barrios Altos, Lima, Peru; the Universidad Nacional San Augustin de Arequipa (S.I.), Department of Medicine, Arequipa, Peru; and the Tel Aviv University (U.O.), Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv, Israel.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: silic{at}photothera.com.

Background and Purpose--The NeuroThera Effectiveness and Safety Trial-1 (NEST-1) study evaluated the safety and preliminary effectiveness of the NeuroThera Laser System in the ability to improve 90-day outcomes in ischemic stroke patients treated within 24 hours from stroke onset. The NeuroThera Laser System therapeutic approach involves use of infrared laser technology and has shown significant and sustained beneficial effects in animal models of ischemic stroke.

Methods--This was a prospective, intention-to-treat, multicenter, international, double-blind, trial involving 120 ischemic stroke patients treated, randomized 2:1 ratio, with 79 patients in the active treatment group and 41 in the sham (placebo) control group. Only patients with baseline stroke severity measured by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores of 7 to 22 were included. Patients who received tissue plasminogen activator were excluded. Outcome measures were the patients’ scores on the NIHSS, modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Barthel Index, and Glasgow Outcome Scale at 90 days after treatment. The primary outcome measure, prospectively identified, was successful treatment, documented by NIHSS. This was defined as a complete recovery at day 90 (NIHSS 0 to 1), or a decrease in NIHSS score of at least 9 points (day 90 versus baseline), and was tested as a binary measure (bNIH). Secondary outcome measures included mRS, Barthel Index, and Glasgow Outcome Scale. Primary statistical analyses were performed with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel rank test, stratified by baseline NIHSS score or by time to treatment for the bNIH and mRS. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to confirm the results.

Results--Mean time to treatment was >16 hours (median time to treatment 18 hours for active and 17 hours for control). Time to treatment ranged from 2 to 24 hours. More patients (70%) in the active treatment group had successful outcomes than did controls (51%), as measured prospectively on the bNIH (P=0.035 stratified by severity and time to treatment; P=0.048 stratified only by severity). Similarly, more patients (59%) had successful outcomes than did controls (44%) as measured at 90 days as a binary mRS score of 0 to 2 (P=0.034 stratified by severity and time to treatment; P=0.043 stratified only by severity). Also, more patients in the active treatment group had successful outcomes than controls as measured by the change in mean NIHSS score from baseline to 90 days (P=0.021 stratified by time to treatment) and the full mRS ("shift in Rankin") score (P=0.020 stratified by severity and time to treatment; P=0.026 stratified only by severity). The prevalence odds ratio for bNIH was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.93) and for binary mRS was 1.38 (95% CI, 1.03 to 1.83), controlling for baseline severity. Similar results held for the Barthel Index and Glasgow Outcome Scale. Mortality rates and serious adverse events (SAEs) did not differ significantly (8.9% and 25.3% for active 9.8% and 36.6% for control, respectively, for mortality and SAEs).

Conclusion--The NEST-1 study indicates that infrared laser therapy has shown initial safety and effectiveness for the treatment of ischemic stroke in humans when initiated within 24 hours of stroke onset. A larger confirmatory trial to demonstrate safety and effectiveness is warranted.


Key words: acute stroke • clinical trial • infrared laser therapy • neuroprotection • safety and effectiveness




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. Mandava and T. A. Kent
A Method to Determine Stroke Trial Success Using Multidimensional Pooled Control Functions
Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): 1803 - 1810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
W. W. Wasiewski
To Phase 3 or Not to Phase 3?
Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): 1553 - 1554.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. L. Saver and J. Gornbein
Treatment effects for which shift or binary analyses are advantageous in acute stroke trials
Neurology, April 14, 2009; 72(15): 1310 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. A. Zivin, G. W. Albers, N. Bornstein, T. Chippendale, B. Dahlof, T. Devlin, M. Fisher, W. Hacke, W. Holt, S. Ilic, et al.
Effectiveness and Safety of Transcranial Laser Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1359 - 1364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. A. Lapchak, M.-K. Han, K. F. Salgado, J. Streeter, and J. A. Zivin
Safety Profile of Transcranial Near-Infrared Laser Therapy Administered in Combination With Thrombolytic Therapy to Embolized Rabbits
Stroke, November 1, 2008; 39(11): 3073 - 3078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. B. Singhal and E. H. Lo
Advances in Emerging Nondrug Therapies for Acute Stroke 2007
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 289 - 291.
[Full Text] [PDF]