Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on August 9, 2007

Stroke. 2007
Published online before print August 9, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.478842
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/9/2536    most recent
STROKEAHA.106.478842v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Govan, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Govan, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Medical

Submitted on December 4, 2006
Revised on March 12, 2007
Accepted on March 20, 2007

Does the Prevention of Complications Explain the Survival Benefit of Organized Inpatient (Stroke Unit) Care?. Further Analysis of a Systematic Review

Lindsay Govan BSc, Hons; Peter Langhorne PhD*; Christopher J. Weir PhD; for the Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration

From the Robertson Centre for Biostatistics (L.G., C.J.W.), University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; and the Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine (P.L.), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pl11m{at}clinmed.gla.ac.uk.

Background and Purpose—Systematic reviews have shown that organized inpatient (stroke unit) care reduces the risk of death after stroke. However, it is unclear how this is achieved. We tested whether stroke unit care could reduce deaths by preventing complications.

Methods—We updated a collaborative systematic review of 31 controlled clinical trials (6936 participants) to include reported interventions and complications during early hospital care plus the certified cause of death during follow up. Each secondary analysis used data from between 7 and 17 studies (1652 to 3327 participants). Complications were grouped as physiological, neurological, cardiovascular, complications of immobility, and others. Bayesian hierarchical models were used to estimate odds ratios for features occurring in stroke units versus conventional care.

Results—Based on the data of 17 trials (3327 participants), organized (stroke unit) care reduced case fatality during scheduled follow up (OR: 0.75; 95% credible intervals: 0.59 to 0.92), in particular deaths certified as attributable to complications of immobility (0.59; 0.41 to 0.86). Stroke unit care was associated with statistically significant increases in the reported use of oxygen (2.39; 1.39 to 4.66), measures to prevent aspiration (2.42; 1.36 to 4.36), and paracetamol (2.80; 1.14 to 4.83) plus a nonsignificant reduction in the use of urinary catheterization. Stroke units were associated with statistically significant reductions in stroke progression/recurrence (0.66; 0.46 to 0.95) and in some complications of immobility: chest infections (0.60; 0.42 to 0.87), other infections (0.56; 0.40 to 0.84), and pressure sores (0.44; 0.22 to 0.85). There were no significant differences in cardiovascular, physiological, or other complications.

Conclusions—Organized inpatient (stroke unit) care appears to reduce the risk of death after stroke through the prevention and treatment of complications, in particular infections.


Key words: complications • meta-analysis • stroke outcome • stroke units




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A Terent, K Asplund, B Farahmand, K M Henriksson, B Norrving, B Stegmayr, P-O Wester, K H Asberg, S Asberg, and for the Riks-Stroke Collaboration
Stroke unit care revisited: who benefits the most? A cohort study of 105 043 patients in Riks-Stroke, the Swedish Stroke Register
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2009; 80(8): 881 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
O. Saka, V. Serra, Y. Samyshkin, A. McGuire, and C. C.D.A. Wolfe
Cost-Effectiveness of Stroke Unit Care Followed by Early Supported Discharge
Stroke, January 1, 2009; 40(1): 24 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Saposnik, J. Fang, M. O'Donnell, V. Hachinski, M. K. Kapral, M. D. Hill, and on behalf of the Investigators of the Registry of
Escalating Levels of Access to In-Hospital Care and Stroke Mortality
Stroke, September 1, 2008; 39(9): 2522 - 2530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. F. Lyons, A. G. Rudd, and C. Alvaro
Advances in Health Policy 2007
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 264 - 267.
[Full Text] [PDF]