Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on May 31, 2007

Stroke. 2007
Published online before print May 31, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.480731
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/7/2079    most recent
STROKEAHA.106.480731v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Messé, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Warach, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Messé, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Warach, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*CT Scans
*MRI Scans
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Emergency treatment of Stroke
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow Thrombolysis
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on December 19, 2006
Revised on February 16, 2007
Accepted on March 8, 2007

CT-NIHSS Mismatch Does Not Correlate With MRI Diffusion-Perfusion Mismatch

Steven R. Messé MD*; Scott E. Kasner MD; Julio A. Chalela MD; Brett Cucchiara MD; Andrew M. Demchuk MD; Michael D. Hill MD; and Steven Warach MD

From Department of Neurology (S.R.M., S.E.K., B.C.), University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.A.C.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.M.D., M.D.H.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; National Institutes of Health (S.W.), Bethesda, MD.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: messe{at}mail.med.upenn.edu.

Background and Purpose--MRI diffusion-perfusion mismatch may identify patients for thrombolysis beyond 3 hours. However, MRI has limited availability in many hospitals. We investigated whether mismatch between the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) and the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) correlates with MRI diffusion-perfusion mismatch.

Methods--We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent MRI and CT at admission. NIHSS was performed by the admitting physician. MRI and CT were reviewed by 2 blinded expert raters. Degree of MRI mismatch was defined as present (> 25%) or absent (<25%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine characteristics associated with MRI mismatch. Probability of MRI mismatch was calculated for all combinations of ASPECTS and NIHSS cutoff scores.

Results--Included in the analysis were 143 patients. Median NIHSS on admission was 4 (IQR, 2 to 10); median ASPECTS was 10 (IQR, 9 to 10). Median time to completion of MRI and CT was 4.5 (2.5 to 13.9) hours after onset. CT and MRI were separated by a median of 35 (IQR, 29 to 44) minutes. MRI mismatch was present in 41% of patients. In multivariate analysis, only shorter time-to-scan (OR, 0.96 per hour; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.0; P=0.043) was associated with MRI mismatch. There was no combination of NIHSS and ASPECTS thresholds that was significantly associated with MRI mismatch.

Conclusions--ASPECTS-NIHSS mismatch did not correlate with MRI diffusion-perfusion mismatch in this clinical cohort. MRI mismatch was associated with decreasing time from stroke onset to scan.


Key words: cerebral infarct • computed tomography • ischemic penumbra • magnetic resonance imaging • mismatch • neuroradiology • thrombolysis


Related Article:

CT/NIHSS Mismatch for Detection of Salvageable Brain in Acute Stroke Triage Beyond the 3-Hour Time Window: Overrated or Undervalued?
Michael H. Lev
Stroke 2007 38: 2028-2029. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E.S. Rosenthal, L.H. Schwamm, L. Roccatagliata, S.B. Coutts, A.M. Demchuk, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. Gonzalez, M.D. Hill, E.F. Halpern, and M.H. Lev
Role of Recanalization in Acute Stroke Outcome: Rationale for a CT Angiogram-Based "Benefit of Recanalization" Model
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1471 - 1475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. G. Sorensen and W.-D. Heiss
Advances in Imaging 2007
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 276 - 278.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. H. Lev
CT/NIHSS Mismatch for Detection of Salvageable Brain in Acute Stroke Triage Beyond the 3-Hour Time Window: Overrated or Undervalued?
Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2028 - 2029.
[Full Text] [PDF]