on May 31, 2007
Published online before print May 31, 2007, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.482869
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on January 19, 2007
From Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (L.D.W., I.B., H.F., W.D.W.), Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium; Department of Health Sciences and Medical Sociology (K.P., M.L., F.L.), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium; RehaClinic Zurzach (B.S., F.A., C.K., W.J.), Switzerland; NHS Trust (P.B.) Nottingham, UK; Biostatistical Center (A.K., K.B., E.L.), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium; Fachklinik Herzogenaurach (N.B., W.S.), Germany; Institute of Work, Health and Organisations (L.C. N.L., B.S.), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; University Hospital Pellenberg (E.D.), Belgium. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Liesbet.Dewit{at}faber.kuleuven.be.
Background and Purpose--Outcome after first stroke varies significantly across Europe. This study was designed to compare motor and functional recovery after stroke between four European rehabilitation centers. Methods--Consecutive stroke patients (532 patients) were recruited. They were assessed on admission and at 2, 4, and 6 months after stroke with the Barthel Index, Rivermead Motor Assessment of Gross Function, Rivermead Motor Assessment of Leg/Trunk, Rivermead Motor Assessment of Arm, and Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (except on admission). Data were analyzed using random effects ordinal logistic models adjusting for case-mix and multiple testing. Results--Patients in the UK center were more likely to stay in lower Rivermead Motor Assessment of Gross Function classes compared with patients in the German center ( Conclusions--Gross motor and functional recovery were better in the German and Swiss centers compared with the UK center, respectively. Personal self-care recovery was better in the UK compared with the German center. Previous studies in the same centers indicated that German and Swiss patients received more therapy per day. This was not the result of more staff but of a more efficient use of human resources. This study indicates potential for improving rehabilitation outcomes in the UK and Belgian centers.
Accepted on February 26, 2007
Motor and Functional Recovery After Stroke. A Comparison of 4 European Rehabilitation Centers
Liesbet De Wit PT, PhD*; 
t Komárek PhD;
OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.3). In the Swiss center, patients were less likely to stay in lower Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living classes compared with patients in the UK center (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9). The latter were less likely to stay in lower Barthel Index classes compared with the patients in the German center (OR, 0.6; 95%CI, 0.4 to 0.8). Recovery patterns of Rivermead Motor Assessment of Leg/Trunk and Rivermead Motor Assessment of Arm were not significantly different between centers.
Key words: recovery • rehabilitation centers • stroke
Related Article:
Stroke 2007 38: 2030-2031.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  S. F Tyson, L. Connell, M. Busse, and S. Lennon What do acute stroke physiotherapists do to treat postural control and mobility? An exploration of the content of therapy in the UK Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 2009; 23(11): 1051 - 1055. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Britton, N. Harris, and A. Turton An exploratory randomized controlled trial of assisted practice for improving sit-to-stand in stroke patients in the hospital setting Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2008; 22(5): 458 - 468. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Brandt Motor and Functional Recovery After Stroke: A Comparison Between 4 European Rehabilitation Centers Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2030 - 2031. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|