Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on February 7, 2008

Stroke. 2008
Published online before print February 7, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.490672
A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/3/838    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.490672v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benisty, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chabriat, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benisty, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chabriat, H.

Submitted on April 13, 2007
Revised on July 26, 2007
Accepted on August 14, 2007

Diagnostic Criteria of Vascular Dementia in CADASIL

Sarah Benisty MD; Karen Hernandez MSc; Anand Viswanathan MD, PhD; Sonia Reyes MSc; Annie Kurtz MSc; Michael O'Sullivan PhD; Marie-Germaine Bousser MD; Martin Dichgans MD, PhD; and Hugues Chabriat MD, PhD*

From Department of Geriatric Medicine (S.B.) and Department of Neurology (K.H., S.R., A.K., M.-G.B., H.C.), University Paris VII, France; Department of Neurology and Clinical Trials Unit (A.V.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Department of Neurology (M.O., M.D.), Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hugues.chabriat{at}lrb.aphp.fr.

Background and Purpose—Subcortical ischemic vascular dementia (SIVD) is a major subtype of vascular dementia (VaD). Recently, the diagnostic criteria of VaD have been modified to encompass this entity. Application of these criteria in CADASIL, a genetic model of SIVD, may help to better assess their significance. The aim of this study was to compare different sets of diagnostic criteria of VaD in a population of CADASIL patients.

Methods—Different sets of diagnostic criteria of VaD (DSMIV, ICD10, standard NINDS-AIREN, modified NINDS-AIREN for SIVD) were applied to 115 CADASIL patients. Diagnosis of VaD was made through 2 steps: (1) diagnosis of dementia and (2) association of dementia to lesions of vascular origin. The percentage of patients satisfying the different sets and the concordance between these criteria was analyzed.

Results—At least 1 set of criteria was satisfied for diagnosis in 29 subjects with dementia. In this group of patients, the sensitivity of the DSM IV, ICD 10, and standard NINDS-AIREN criteria for VaD was, respectively, 79%, 72%, and 45%. In contrast, the sensitivity of the NINDS-AIREN criteria for SIVD was 90%. The incomplete sensitivity of these last criteria was related to the absence of focal signs in some patients. The neuroimaging criteria were satisfied in all patients with dementia.

Conclusions—The modified NINDS-AIREN criteria of SIVD are the most sensitive VaD criteria in CADASIL. Among these criteria, the neuroimaging criteria, although poorly specific to dementia, have a complete sensitivity. In contrast, focal signs were inconstant in CADASIL patients with dementia.


Key words: CADASIL • diagnostic criteria • leukoariosis • vascular dementia