Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on January 3, 2008

Stroke. 2008
Published online before print January 3, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.491241
A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/2/503    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.491241v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dittrich, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ringelstein, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dittrich, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ringelstein, E. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.

Submitted on May 13, 2007
Accepted on June 7, 2007

Occurrence and Clinical Impact of Microembolic Signals During or After Cardiosurgical Procedures

Ralf Dittrich MD* and E. Bernd Ringelstein MD

From the Department of Neurology (R.D., E.B.R.) and the Leibniz Institute for Atherosclerosis Research (R.D., E.B.R.), University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dittrir{at}gmx.de.

Background and Purpose—Microembolic signals (MESs) are detectable within the transcranial Doppler frequency spectrum downstream from vascular atherothrombotic or cardiothrombotic lesions. A frequent occurrence of MESs has also been shown during bypass surgery or after mechanical valve implantation. We sought to compile the knowledge on MES prevalence, the clinical impact of these cardiogenic MESs, and microemboli composition.

Summary of Review—We performed a systematic MEDLINE search and summarized the currently available literature about MESs during or after cardiosurgical procedures for this state-of-the-art report.

Conclusions—The nature of cardiogenic MESs is heterogeneous, and their prevalence is highly variable, reflecting their different origin from a broad spectrum of cardiosurgical conditions. The occurrence and number of MESs during cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary angioplasty seem to have a clinical impact but need to be explored further. In patients with prosthetic heart valves, in those with left ventricular assist devices, and during cardiac surgery, the occurrence of MESs has an important clinical impact, and MES monitoring has proven its reliability. Although the data encourage intensifying MES detection in cardiac disorders, their heterogeneous nature does not yet allow the use of MESs as a general surrogate parameter for neuronal damage or cardial thromboembolic risk.


Key words: cardiac embolism • cardiac surgery • cognitive impairment • tcd • transcranial Doppler • ultrasound