Published Online
on November 29, 2007

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2008

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 39/1/120    most recent STROKEAHA.107.495747v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnston, S. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Johnston, S. C. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Brain Aneurysm Related Collections Other Treatment Aneurysm, AVM, hematoma Other Stroke Treatment - Surgical

Submitted on June 6, 2007
Accepted on June 27, 2007

Predictors of Rehemorrhage After Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. The Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) Study

S. Claiborne Johnston MD, PhD^*; Christopher F. Dowd MD; Randall T. Higashida MD; Michael T. Lawton MD; Gary R. Duckwiler MD; Daryl R. Gress MD; for the CARAT Investigators

From the Departments of Neurology (S.C.J.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.C.J.), Radiology (C.F.D.), and Neurosurgery (M.T.L.), University of California, San Francisco; the Department of Radiology (G.R.D.), University of California, Los Angeles; and the Department of Neurology (D.R.G.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: clay.johnston{at}ucsfmedctr.org.

Background and Purpose—The primary purpose of intracranial aneurysm treatment is to prevent rupture. Risk factors for rupture after aneurysm treatment have not been clearly established, and the need to completely occlude aneurysms is debated.

Methods—The Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study is an ambidirectional cohort study of all patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization or surgical clipping at 9 high-volume centers in the United States from 1996 to 1998. All subjects were followed through 2005, and all potential reruptures were adjudicated by a panel of 3 specialists without knowledge of the initial treatment or aneurysm characteristics. Degree of aneurysm occlusion post-treatment was evaluated as a predictor of nonprocedural rerupture in univariate Kaplan–Meier analysis (log-rank test) and in a Cox proportional-hazards model after adjustment for potential confounders and censoring at time of retreatment.

Results—Among 1001 patients during a mean of 4.0 years follow-up, there were 19 postprocedural reruptures; median time to rerupture was 3 days and 58% led to death. The degree of aneurysm occlusion after treatment was strongly associated with risk of rerupture (overall risk: 1.1% for complete occlusion, 2.9% for 91% to 99% occlusion, 5.9% for 70% to 90%, 17.6% for <70%; P<0.0001 in univariate and multivariable analysis). Overall risk of rerupture tended to be greater after coil embolization compared with surgical clipping (3.4% versus 1.3%; P=0.092), but the difference did not persist after adjustment (P=0.83).

Conclusions—Degree of aneurysm occlusion after the initial treatment is a strong predictor of the risk of subsequent rupture in patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage, which justifies attempts to completely occlude aneurysms.

Key words: coil embolization • intracranial aneurysm • subarachnoid hemorrhage • surgical clipping

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Gallas, A.C. Januel, A. Pasco, J. Drouineau, J. Gabrillargues, A. Gaston, C. Cognard, and D. Herbreteau Long-Term Follow-Up of 1036 Cerebral Aneurysms Treated by Bare Coils: A Multicentric Cohort Treated between 1998 and 2003 AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2009; 30(10): 1986 - 1992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Raymond Counterpoint: Has the Last Word Been Said? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2009; 30(9): 1649 - 1652. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.A. Willinsky, J. Peltz, L. da Costa, R. Agid, R.I. Farb, and K.G. terBrugge Clinical and Angiographic Follow-up of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Endovascular Embolization AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2009; 30(5): 1035 - 1040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. K. Wakhloo, M. J. Deleo III, and M. M. Brown Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e305 - e312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Schaafsma, M. E. Sprengers, W. J. van Rooij, M. Sluzewski, C. B.L.M. Majoie, M. J.H. Wermer, and G. J.E. Rinkel Long-Term Recurrent Subarachnoid Hemorrhage After Adequate Coiling Versus Clipping of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): 1758 - 1763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P.M. White and J. Raymond Endovascular Coiling of Cerebral Aneurysms Using "Bioactive" or Coated-Coil Technologies: A Systematic Review of the Literature AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2009; 30(2): 219 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Shapiro, J. Babb, T. Becske, and P.K. Nelson Safety and Efficacy of Adjunctive Balloon Remodeling during Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Literature Review AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1777 - 1781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.A. Renowden, P. Koumellis, V. Benes, W. Mukonoweshuro, A.J. Molyneux, and N.S. McConachie Retreatment of Previously Embolized Cerebral Aneurysms: The Risk of Further Coil Embolization Does Not Negate the Advantage of the Initial Embolization AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1401 - 1404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. O'Kelly and R. L. Macdonald Coiling and Aneurysm Rerupture: Incomplete Treatment Is a Causal Intermediate Not a Confounder Stroke, July 1, 2008; 39(7): e121 - e121. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Johnston and for The Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatmen Response to Letter by O'Kelly and Macdonald Stroke, July 1, 2008; 39(7): e122 - e122. [Full Text] [PDF]