| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on July 4, 2007
From the Department of Surgery, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, University of Siena, Italy. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: e.chisci{at}libero.it.
Background and Purpose—The accuracy of carotid ultrasound has not been well established in predicting intrastent restenosis (ISR) after carotid artery stenting (CAS). The aim of this study is to determine different degrees of ISR using ultrasound velocity criteria compared to percentage of stenosis at angiography. Methods—This is a 6-year prospective study. After CAS procedure, each patient underwent angiography for measuring ISR (NASCET method) which was compared to peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), and the ratio between PSV of internal carotid artery and common carotid artery (ICA/CCA). This was done within 48 hours, thus creating a baseline value. Ultrasound (US) examination was performed at day 30, at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and then yearly. Patients with an increase in PSV greater than 3 times the baseline value or in presence of PSV Results—814 CAS procedures, 6427 US examinations, and 1123 angiographies were performed. ISR Conclusions—US grading of carotid ISR can guarantee a correct follow-up after CAS if new customized velocity criteria are validated by skilled operators using a specific protocol of follow-up in a certified laboratory.
Accepted on September 7, 2007
Grading Carotid Intrastent Restenosis. A 6-Year Follow-Up Study
Carlo Setacci MD;
200 cm/s underwent angiography.
70% and ISR
50% was detected, respectively, in 22 patients and in 73 patients. We defined velocity criteria for grading carotid ISR: PSV
104 cm/s, if <30% stenosis; PSV:105 to 174 cm/s if 30% to 50% stenosis; PSV:175 to 299 cm/s if a 50% to 70% stenosis; PSV
300 cm/s, EDV
140 cm/s, and ICA/CCA
3.8 if a
70% stenosis. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for ISR
70% were, respectively, for PSV, EDV, and ICA/CCA: 0.99, 0.98, and 0.99.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. P. Yan, D. J. Clark, M. R. Jaff, T. J. Kiernan, R. M. Schainfeld, S. Lessio, and K. Rosenfield Carotid Duplex Ultrasound Velocity Measurements Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Detecting Carotid In-Stent Restenosis Circ Cardiovasc Interv, October 1, 2009; 2(5): 438 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Heck Incidence and time course of carotid in-stent restenosis in a consecutive series of 295 patients JNIS, July 3, 2009; (2009) jnis.2009.000349v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Heck Results of cutting balloon angioplasty for carotid artery in-stent restenosis in six patients: description of the technique, long-term outcomes, and review of the literature JNIS, July 1, 2009; 1(1): 48 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Wakhloo, M. J. Deleo III, and M. M. Brown Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e305 - e312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |