on April 24, 2008
Published online before print April 24, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.499806
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on July 18, 2007
From the Neurology (R.M.) and Sociology (L.B.) Departments, Masaryk University, St. Anne Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic; CEGEDIM (Institute for Analysis of Medical and Pharmaceutical Information) (D.H., J.K.), Czech Republic; the Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses (L.D.), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and the Neurology Department (D.V.), Ostrava Vitkovice, Czech Republic. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mikulik{at}hotmail.com.
Background and Purpose—Stroke treatment is time-dependent, yet no study has systematically examined response to individual stroke symptoms in the general population. This nationwide study identifies which specific factors prompt correct response (calling 911) to stroke. Methods—Between November and December of 2005, a survey using a 3-stage random-sampling method including area, household, and household member sampling was conducted throughout the Czech Republic. Participants >40 years old were personally interviewed via a structured and standardized questionnaire concerning general knowledge and correct response to stroke as assessed by the Stroke Action Test (STAT). Predictors of scoring >50% on STAT were identified by multiple regression. Results—A total of 650 households were contacted, yielding 592 interviews (response rate 91%). Mean age was 58±12, 55% women. Sixty-nine percent thought stroke was serious condition, and 57% thought it could be treated. Also 54% correctly named Conclusions—Knowledge about stroke in the Czech Republic was fair, yet response to warning signs was poor. Our study is the first to identify that calling 911 was influenced by knowledge that stroke is a serious and treatable disease and not by recognition of symptoms.
Revised on September 25, 2007
Accepted on November 7, 2007
Calling 911 in Response to Stroke. A Nationwide Study Assessing Definitive Individual Behavior
Robert Mikulík MD, PhD*; 
ka; 
ek PhD; 
í Kr
za
2 risk factors, and 46% named 2 warning signs. Eighteen percent of respondents scored >50% on STAT. The predictors of such a score were age (for each 10-year increment, OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.7), secondary school education (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.6), knowing that stroke is a serious disease (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.1), and knowing that stroke is treatable (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.2).
Key words: stroke • emergency medical services • educational campaigns • awareness • thrombolysis
Related Article:
Stroke 2008 39: 1667.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. Muller-Nordhorn, K. Wegscheider, C. H. Nolte, G. J. Jungehulsing, K. Rossnagel, A. Reich, S. Roll, A. Villringer, and S. N. Willich Population-Based Intervention to Reduce Prehospital Delays in Patients With Cerebrovascular Events Arch Intern Med, September 14, 2009; 169(16): 1484 - 1490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Kleindorfer, J. Khoury, J. P. Broderick, E. Rademacher, D. Woo, M. L. Flaherty, K. Alwell, C. J. Moomaw, A. Schneider, A. Pancioli, et al. Temporal Trends in Public Awareness of Stroke: Warning Signs, Risk Factors, and Treatment Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2502 - 2506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. I. Lindley Improving Onset to Needle Time: Knowledge Is Not Enough Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1667 - 1667. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|