Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on August 21, 2008

Stroke. 2008
Published online before print August 21, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513358
A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/11/2986    most recent
STROKEAHA.107.513358v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lev, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lev, M. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Acute Stroke Syndromes
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Submitted on December 21, 2007
Revised on March 17, 2008
Accepted on March 31, 2008

Quantitative Assessment of Core/Penumbra Mismatch in Acute Stroke. CT and MR Perfusion Imaging Are Strongly Correlated When Sufficient Brain Volume Is Imaged

Pamela W. Schaefer MD*; Elizabeth R. Barak MD; Shahmir Kamalian MD; Leila Rezai Gharai MD; Lee Schwamm MD; Ramon Gilberto Gonzalez MD, PhD; and Michael H. Lev MD

From the Departments of Radiology (P.W.S., E.R.B., S.K., L.R.G., R.G.G., M.H.L.), and Neurology (L.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pschaefer{at}partners.org.

Background and Purpose—Our purpose was to determine (1) the correlation between quantitative CT and MR measurements of infarct core, penumbra, and mismatch; and (2) whether the difference between these measurements would alter patient selection for stroke clinical trials.

Methods—We studied 45 patients with acute middle cerebral artery stroke imaged a mean of 3.8 hours after onset (range, 0.48 to 8.35 hours) who underwent CT perfusion and MR diffusion (DWI)/perfusion imaging within 3 hours of each other. The DWI and MR-mean transit time (MTT) abnormalities were visually segmented using a semiautomated commercial analysis program. The CT-cerebral blood volume) and CT-MTT lesions were automatically segmented using a relative cerebral blood volume threshold of 0.56 and a relative MTT threshold of 1.50 on commercially available software. Percent mismatch was defined as [(MTT-DWI)/DWI volume]x100. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated.

Results—There were significant correlations for DWI versus CT-cerebral blood volume lesion volumes (r2=0.88, P<0.001), for MR-MTT versus CT-MTT lesion volumes(r2=0.86, P<0.001), and for MR-MTT/DWI versus CT-MTT/CT-cerebral blood volume mismatch lesion volumes(r2=0.81, P<0.001). MR perfusion and CT perfusion agreed for determining: (1) infarct core < versus ≥100 mL in 41 of 45 (91.1%); (2) MTT lesion size < versus >2 cm diameter in 42 of 45 (93.3%); (3) mismatch < versus >20% in 41 of 45 (91.1%); and (4) inclusion versus exclusion from trial enrollment in 38 of 45 (84.4%) patients. Six of 7 disagreements were due to inadequate CT coverage.

Conclusion—Advanced MR and CT perfusion imaging measurements of core/penumbra mismatch for patient selection in stroke trials are highly correlated when CT perfusion coverage is sufficient to include most of the ischemic region. Although MR is currently the preferred imaging method for determining core and penumbra, CT perfusion is comparable and potentially more available.


Key words: acute ischemic • acute stroke • CT • MRI • penumbra • perfusion CT imaging • perfusion MR imaging




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. K. Natarajan, K. V. Snyder, A. H. Siddiqui, C. C. Ionita, L. N. Hopkins, and E. I. Levy
Safety and Effectiveness of Endovascular Therapy After 8 Hours of Acute Ischemic Stroke Onset and Wake-Up Strokes
Stroke, October 1, 2009; 40(10): 3269 - 3274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
F. Miteff, C. R. Levi, G. A. Bateman, N. Spratt, P. McElduff, and M. W. Parsons
The independent predictive utility of computed tomography angiographic collateral status in acute ischaemic stroke
Brain, August 1, 2009; 132(8): 2231 - 2238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. W. Schaefer, K. Mui, S. Kamalian, R. G. Nogueira, R. G. Gonzalez, and M. H. Lev
Avoiding "Pseudo-Reversibility" of CT-CBV Infarct Core Lesions in Acute Stroke Patients After Thrombolytic Therapy: The Need for Algorithmically "Delay-Corrected" CT Perfusion Map Postprocessing Software
Stroke, August 1, 2009; 40(8): 2875 - 2878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Wintermark, H. A. Rowley, and M. H. Lev
Acute Stroke Triage to Intravenous Thrombolysis and Other Therapies with Advanced CT or MR Imaging: Pro CT
Radiology, June 1, 2009; 251(3): 619 - 626.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.S. Ahmed, M. Zellerhoff, C.M. Strother, K.A. Pulfer, T. Redel, Y. Deuerling-Zheng, K. Royalty, D. Consigny, and D.B. Niemann
C-Arm CT Measurement of Cerebral Blood Volume: An Experimental Study in Canines
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2009; 30(5): 917 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
W.-D. Heiss and A. G. Sorensen
Advances in Imaging
Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e313 - e314.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.A. Konstas, G.V. Goldmakher, T.-Y. Lee, and M.H. Lev
Theoretic Basis and Technical Implementations of CT Perfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke, Part 1: Theoretic Basis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2009; 30(4): 662 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]