Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on August 14, 2008

Stroke. 2008
Published online before print August 14, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.515247
A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/11/3099    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.515247v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barra, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pérennou, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barra, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pérennou, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation

Submitted on January 17, 2008
Revised on February 11, 2008
Accepted on February 29, 2008

Are Rotations in Perceived Visual Vertical and Body Axis After Stroke Caused by the Same Mechanism?

Julien Barra PhD; Charles Benaim MD, PhD; Valérie Chauvineau MD; Théophile Ohlmann PhD; Michael Gresty PhD; and Dominic Pérennou MD, PhD*

From the Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition (J.B., T.O.), Université Pierre Mendès France, Grenoble, France; Clinique de MPR-CHU et Université Joseph Fourrier (J.B., V.C., D.P.), Grenoble, France; Service de Rééducation Neurologique (C.B., D.P.), CHU Dijon, France; and the Divisions of Neuroscience & Mental Health (M.G.), Imperial College London, London, UK.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: DPerennou{at}chu-grenoble.fr.

Background and Purpose—The aim of this study was to investigate whether allocentric and egocentric coordinate systems are congruently biased after hemisphere stroke, which would suggest a single underlying mechanism.

Methods—The perception of the long body axis (LBA), an egocentric reference, and that of the subjective visual vertical (SVV), an allocentric reference, was assessed in both the upright position and with 30° lateral body tilts in 15 patients with a hemisphere stroke and 12 control subjects.

Results—In control subjects, estimates were accurate in upright but rotated in tilted positions (LBA 7°±6° overestimation and SVV 8.8°±7.8° toward the body). In patients, SVV (-4.4°±4.6°) and LBA (-4.8°±5.3°) were congruent in upright positions and when patients were ipsilesionally tilted (1.5°±7° and 1.9°±7°, respectively). In contrast, SVV and LBA were dissociated when the body was tilted to the contralesional side with overestimation of the LBA (-9.2°±4.6°) but no effect on SVV (-4.1°±6.4°).

Conclusions—Because rotations in egocentric and allocentric reference systems found after stroke are differently modulated by lateral tilts, they are not due to a single underlying mechanism. However, they share common bases and can be simultaneously reduced by ipsilesional body tilt. Differences in the way somesthetic information is integrated may explain the differences in LBA and SVV.


Key words: longitudinal body axis • pushing • spatial representation • stroke • subjective visual vertical




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. Barra, L. Oujamaa, V. Chauvineau, P. Rougier, and D. Perennou
Asymmetric standing posture after stroke is related to a biased egocentric coordinate system
Neurology, May 5, 2009; 72(18): 1582 - 1587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]