| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on March 28, 2008
From Stroke Service, Department of Neurology (H.A., L.H.S., K.L.F.) and AA Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology (H.A., E.M.A., M.V., A.G.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; the Departments of Neurology and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.C.J.), University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif; and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (W.J.K.), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hay{at}partners.org.
Background and Purpose—Predictive instruments based on clinical features for early stroke risk after transient ischemic attack suffer from limited specificity. We sought to combine imaging and clinical features to improve predictions for 7-day stroke risk after transient ischemic attack. Methods—We studied 601 consecutive patients with transient ischemic attack who had MRI within 24 hours of symptom onset. A logistic regression model was developed using stroke within 7 days as the response criterion and diffusion-weighted imaging findings and dichotomized ABCD2 score (ABCD2 Results—Subsequent stroke occurred in 25 patients (5.2%). Dichotomized ABCD2 score and acute infarct on diffusion-weighted imaging were each independent predictors of stroke risk. The 7-day risk was 0.0% with no predictor, 2.0% with ABCD2 score Conclusions—Combining acute imaging findings with clinical transient ischemic attack features causes a dramatic boost in the accuracy of predictions with clinical features alone for early risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack. If validated in relevant clinical settings, risk stratification by the CIP model may assist in early implementation of therapeutic measures and effective use of hospital resources.
Revised on May 19, 2008
Accepted on May 27, 2008
Clinical- and Imaging-Based Prediction of Stroke Risk After Transient Ischemic Attack. The CIP Model
Hakan Ay MD*;
4) as covariates.
4 alone, 4.9% with acute infarct on diffusion-weighted imaging alone, and 14.9% with both predictors (an automated calculator is available at http://cip.martinos.org). Adding imaging increased the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.66 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.76) using the ABCD2 score to 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.88; P=0.003). The sensitivity of 80% on the receiver operating characteristic curve corresponded to a specificity of 73% for the CIP model and 47% for the ABCD2 score.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. W. Asimos, W. D. Rosamond, A. M. Johnson, M. F. Price, K. M. Rose, C. V. Murphy, C. H. Tegeler, and A. Felix Early Diffusion Weighted MRI as a Negative Predictor for Disabling Stroke After ABCD2 Score Risk Categorization in Transient Ischemic Attack Patients Stroke, October 1, 2009; 40(10): 3252 - 3257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Prabhakaran and V. H. Lee Does Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Transient Ischemic Attack Patients Improve Accuracy of Diagnosis, Prognosis, or Both? Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e408 - e408. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Arsava and H. Ay Response to Letter by Prabhakaran and Lee Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e409 - e409. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |