Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on October 23, 2008

Stroke. 2008
Published online before print October 23, 2008, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.523621
A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/1/163    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.523621v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rand, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hung, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rand, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hung, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation

Submitted on April 18, 2008
Revised on May 20, 2008
Accepted on June 3, 2008

How Active Are People With Stroke? Use of Accelerometers to Assess Physical Activity

Debbie Rand PhD, OT; Janice J. Eng PhD, PT/OT*; Pei-Fang Tang PhD, PT; Jiann-Shing Jeng MD, PhD; and Chihya Hung MSc, PT

From the Department of Physical Therapy (D.R., J.J.E., C.H.), University of British Columbia & Rehab Research Lab, GF Strong Rehab Centre, Vancouver, Canada; the School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy (P.-F.T.), College of Medicine, National Taiwan University and the Physical Therapy Center and the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC; the Department of Neurology (J.-S.J.), National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC; and the International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (D.R., J.J.E.), Vancouver, Canada.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Janice.Eng{at}vch.ca.

Background and Purpose—Accelerometers are a unique tool used to objectively measure free-living physical activity, but their reliability for people with stroke has not been established. The primary aim was to assess the day-to-day reliability of these instruments for the paretic and nonparetic hips. The secondary aims were to measure the amount of physical activity with accelerometers that people with stroke undertake in the community and its relationship with walking capacity (6-minute walk test distance).

Methods—Forty people with stroke wore one Actical accelerometer on each hip for 3 consecutive days at home and during the 6-minute walk test in the laboratory. The accelerometer measured physical activity using total activity counts per day and energy expenditure (kcal/d).

Results—Excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the activity counts (paretic hip ICC[1,3]=0.95, nonparetic hip ICC[1,3]=0.94) and for the energy expenditure (paretic hip ICC[1,3]=0.95, nonparetic hip ICC[1,3]=0.95) were found across the 3 consecutive days at home. Excellent ICCs were also found between the paretic versus the nonparetic hips for the activity counts (ICC[1,3]=0.98) and for the energy expenditure (ICC[1,3]=0.96). Free-living physical activity was very low and 58% of the participants did not meet recommended physical activity levels. Only moderate correlations (r=0.6 to 0.73, P<0.001) were found between the 6-minute walk test distance in the laboratory and 3-day physical activity recording at home.

Conclusions—The accelerometer was found to be a reliable objective instrument. The use of accelerometers quantified the low level of free-living physical activity of people with stroke.


Key words: accelerometers • community-dwelling • physical activity • stroke