| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on May 25, 2008
From the Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Section, University of California, San Francisco. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Max.Wintermark{at}radiology.ucsf.edu.
Abstract—Revascularization therapies for acute stroke patients aim to rescue the ischemic penumbra by restoring the patency of the occluded artery ("recanalization") and the downstream capillary blood flow ("reperfusion"). This article reviews the definition of recanalization and reperfusion used in stroke clinical trials and their limitations and proposes a study design to determine the relative importance of recanalization, reperfusion, and collateral flow in evaluating the efficacy of revascularization therapies for acute ischemic stroke.
Accepted on July 30, 2008
MR and CT Monitoring of Recanalization, Reperfusion, and Penumbra Salvage. Everything That Recanalizes Does Not Necessarily Reperfuse!
Bruno P. Soares MD;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Saver, G. W. Albers, B. Dunn, K. C. Johnston, M. Fisher, and for the STAIR VI Consortium Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) Recommendations for Extended Window Acute Stroke Therapy Trials Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2594 - 2600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |