Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on March 19, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print March 19, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.531053
A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/5/1793    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.531053v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gropen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schwamm, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gropen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schwamm, L. H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Emergency treatment of Stroke
Right arrow Primary and Secondary Stroke Prevention
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

Submitted on July 8, 2008
Revised on October 10, 2008
Accepted on November 4, 2008

Regional Implementation of the Stroke Systems of Care Model. Recommendations of the Northeast Cerebrovascular Consortium

Toby Gropen MD*; Zainab Magdon-Ismail Ed.M, MPH; David Day BS; Shannon Melluzzo BA; and Lee H. Schwamm MD

From the Long Island College Hospital (T.G.), Brooklyn, NY; American Stroke Association (Z.M.-I., D.D., S.M.), Dallas, Tex; and Massachusetts General Hospital (L.H.S.), Boston, Mass; on behalf of the NECC Advisory Group.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tgropen{at}chpnet.org.

Background and Purpose—The Northeast Cerebrovascular Consortium was established to examine regional disparities and recommend strategies to improve stroke care based on the Stroke Systems of Care Model.

Methods—An annual summit was first held in 2006, bringing together public health officials, researchers, physicians, nurses, health professionals, state legislators, and advocacy organizations. Best practices and evidence-based interventions within each of the Stroke Systems of Care Model components were presented. Six writing groups were tasked with cataloging each state's current activities and identifying goals for the region.

Results—There were significant variations in the delivery of stroke care, particularly in urban versus rural areas, as evidenced by the availability of designated stroke centers and neurologists, and stroke-related death rates. Recommendations to address variations in care delivery included the use of a common stroke data collection system, unified community education criteria, improvements to emergency medical services dispatch and training, adoption of prehospital care measures, creation of a web-based central repository of acute stroke protocols and order sets, a regional atlas of stroke resources and capabilities, a stroke patient "report card" to promote adherence to secondary prevention strategies, and explicit standards for rehabilitation services.

Conclusions—Significant disparities in the delivery of stroke care across the 8 state-region have been identified. Northeast Cerebrovascular Consortium demonstrates that multistate regional collaboration is a viable process for developing specific regional recommendations to address those disparities. Northeast Cerebrovascular Consortium is assessing the usefulness of the Stroke Systems of Care Model as a framework for implementing a regional approach to stroke across the continuum of care.


Key words: regional implementation • stroke • stroke systems