Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on May 7, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print May 7, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.538587
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/7/2568    most recent
STROKEAHA.108.538587v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubiera, M.
Right arrow Articles by Molina, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubiera, M.
Right arrow Articles by Molina, C. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.
Right arrow Thrombolysis

Submitted on September 25, 2008
Revised on December 26, 2008
Accepted on January 28, 2009

Is it Time to Reassess the SITS-MOST Criteria for Thrombolysis? A Comparison of Patients With and Without SITS-MOST Exclusion Criteria

Marta Rubiera MD, PhD*; Marc Ribo MD, PhD; Estevo Santamarina MD, PhD; Olga Maisterra MD; Raquel Delgado-Mederos MD, PhD; Pilar Delgado MD, PhD; Gemma Ortega; Jose Alvarez-Sabin MD, PhD; and Carlos A. Molina MD, PhD

From the Stroke Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron and Universidad Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mrubifu{at}hotmail.com.

Background and Purpose—The Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) established guidelines to increase safety in acute stroke thrombolysis, but precluding treatment in an important proportion of patients. We aimed to assess safety/efficacy of thrombolysis in patients with SITS-MOST exclusion criteria.

Methods—369 nonlacunar tPA-treated patients were studied. Patients were classified as SITS-MOST (SM) or non–SITS-MOST (NSM) according to SITS-MOST–criteria fulfilling. Clinical evaluation was assessed by NIHSS and functional outcome by mRS at 3 months (functional independency=mRS ≤2).

Results—Baseline NIHSS was 17. 169 (45.8%) patients were SM and 200 (54.1%) NSM. Recanalization (47.6%/50.3%, P=0.36), 24-hour-improvement (55.6%/49.5%, P=0.114), and SICH were similar (4.8%/5.1%, P=0.554). At discharge, clinical improvement in SM-group was higher (66.7%/55.7%, P=0.024). NSM tended to higher mortality (10.5%/16.1%, P=0.084) and lower functional independence (48.7%/39.6%, P=0.082).

Conclusion—Thrombolysis may be safe in patients not fulfilling SITS-MOST criteria. Testing thrombolysis in patients outside SITS-MOST could be considered in the future.


Key words: acute stroke • Doppler • thrombolysis • tPA • guidelines




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. N. Gonzalez-Hernandez, O. Fabre-Pi, J. C. Lopez-Fernandez, and S. Diaz-Nicolas
Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator Thrombolysis in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Previous Stroke
Stroke, December 1, 2009; 40(12): e707 - e707.
[Full Text] [PDF]