Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on April 30, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print April 30, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.548073
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/7/2572    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.548073v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ebinger, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ebinger, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow Thrombolysis

Submitted on January 18, 2009
Accepted on February 26, 2009

Clinical–Diffusion Mismatch and Benefit From Thrombolysis 3 to 6 Hours After Acute Stroke

Martin Ebinger MD, PhD; Takeshi Iwanaga MD; Jane F. Prosser FRACP; Deidre A. De Silva MD; Soren Christensen MMSc; Marnie Collins BCom, BSc; Mark W. Parsons PhD, FRACP; Christopher R. Levi FRACP; Christopher F. Bladin PhD, FRACP; P. Alan Barber PhD, FRACP; Geoffrey A. Donnan MD, FRACP; Stephen M. Davis MD, FRACP*; for the EPITHET Investigators

From the Department of Neurology (M.E., J.F.P., D.A.D.S., S.C., S.M.D.), The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia; the Statistical Consulting Centre (M.C.), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; the Department of Neurology (M.W.P., C.R.L.), Hunter Medical Research Institute, John Hunter Hospital, University of Newcastle, Australia; the Department of Neurology (C.F.B.), Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; the Department of Neurology (P.A.B.), Auckland Hospital, New Zealand; and the Department of Neurology (T.I., G.A.D.), Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Stephen.Davis{at}mh.org.au.

Background and Purpose—The clinical-diffusion mismatch (CDM) model has been proposed as a simpler tool than perfusion-diffusion mismatch (PDM) to select acute ischemic stroke patients for thrombolytic therapy. We hypothesized that in the 3- to 6-hour time window, the effect of tPA was significantly greater in patients with CDM than in patients without CDM.

Methods—This is a substudy of EPITHET, a double-blind multi-center study of 100 patients randomized to tPA or placebo 3 to 6 hours after stroke onset. MRI was obtained before treatment, and at 3 to 5 days and 90 days after treatment. Presence of PDM (perfusion deficit/DWIvolume >1.2 and perfusion deficit at least 10 mL>DWIvolume) and CDM (NIHSS ≥8 and DWIvolume ≤25 mL) was determined for each patient. We assessed lesion growth and neurological improvement (decrease in NIHSS ≥8 points between baseline and 90 days, or a 90-day NIHSS ≤1).

Results—86% of the patients had PDM, but only 41% had CDM. CDM detected PDM with a sensitivity of 46% and a specificity of 86%. We found statistically significant effects of reperfusion on the rate of neurological improvement (OR 9.92, 95% CI 1.91 to 51.64; P<0.01) and on absolute growth (difference: -59.60 mL, 95% CI -95.40 mL to -23.81 mL; P<0.01). Neither treatment with tPA nor reperfusion had a significantly different impact on lesion growth or clinical course in CDM patients compared to patients without CDM.

Conclusions—There was no increased benefit from tPA in patients with CDM. The beneficial effects of reperfusion were similar in patients with and without CDM.


Key words: MRI • stroke • tPA • clinical-diffusion mismatch