Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on May 28, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print May 28, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.552554
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/7/2594    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.552554v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saver, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saver, J. L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Thrombolysis
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Medical

Submitted on March 23, 2009
Accepted on March 26, 2009

Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) Recommendations for Extended Window Acute Stroke Therapy Trials

Jeffrey L. Saver MD; Gregory W. Albers MD; Billy Dunn MD; Karen C. Johnston MD; Marc Fisher MD*; for the STAIR VI Consortium

From the Departments of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (G.W.A.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Calif; Food and Drug Administration (B.D.), Silver Spring, Md; the Department of Neurology (K.C.J.), University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville; the Department of Neurology (J.L.S.), Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif; and the Department of Neurology (M.F.), University of Massachusetts School Medical School, Worcester.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fisherm{at}ummhc.org.

Abstract—The Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) meetings focus on helping to advance the development of acute stroke therapies. Further extending the time window for acute stroke therapies is an important endeavor for increasing the number of stroke patients who might benefit from treatment. The STAIR group recommends that future extended time window trials initially should focus on selected patient groups most likely to respond to investigational therapies and that penumbral imaging is one tool that may identify such patients. The control group in these trials should receive best locally available medical care; if regulatory approval for intravenous (i.v.) tPA is extended to 4.5 hours, then tPA will become the most appropriate comparator in trials conducted within this time window. In future well-designed extended window clinical trials randomization is appropriate and should not be precluded by using unproven treatment with intraarterial (i.a.) thrombolysis or mechanical devices. For proof of concept, extended time window, phase II trials of i.v. thrombolysis, or mechanical devices in which early recanalization/reperfusion is the primary end point, rescue therapy/bailout treatment with i.a. thrombolysis or devices may be acceptable. Statistical considerations and definitions of successful recanalization/reperfusion are suggested for these trials.


Key words: stroke • therapy • clinical trials