Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Information for Advertisers
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Editor Picks
    • Blogging Stroke
    • AHA/ASA Guidelines and Statements
    • ISC and Nursing Symposium Abstracts
    • Progress and Innovation Award Recipients
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Stroke in Women
    • Outstanding Reviewers 2017
  • Resources
    • Online Submission/Peer Review
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • → Tips for Submission
    • → Links and Forms
    • → Revised Manuscripts
    • Costs to Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Wolters Kluwer Author Services
    • Early Career Resources
    • Stroke CME
    • Webinar Series
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join
  • Sign out

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Stroke

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join
  • Sign out

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
    • Information for Advertisers
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • Editor Picks
    • Blogging Stroke
    • AHA/ASA Guidelines and Statements
    • ISC and Nursing Symposium Abstracts
    • Progress and Innovation Award Recipients
    • Acknowledgment of Reviewers
    • Stroke in Women
    • Outstanding Reviewers 2017
  • Resources
    • Online Submission/Peer Review
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • → Tips for Submission
    • → Links and Forms
    • → Revised Manuscripts
    • Costs to Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Wolters Kluwer Author Services
    • Early Career Resources
    • Stroke CME
    • Webinar Series
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Original Contributions

Hemorrhagic Transformation of Ischemic Brain Tissue

Asymptomatic or Symptomatic?

Christian Berger, Marco Fiorelli, Thorsten Steiner, Wolf-Rüdiger Schäbitz, Luigi Bozzao, Erich Bluhmki, Werner Hacke, Rüdiger von Kummer
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.32.6.1330
Stroke. 2001;32:1330-1335
Originally published June 1, 2001
Christian Berger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marco Fiorelli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thorsten Steiner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolf-Rüdiger Schäbitz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luigi Bozzao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erich Bluhmki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Werner Hacke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rüdiger von Kummer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Background and Purpose—The term symptomatic hemorrhage secondary to ischemic stroke implies a clear causal relationship between clinical deterioration and hemorrhagic transformation (HT) regardless of the type of HT. The aim of this study was to assess which type of HT independently affects clinical outcome.

Methods—We used the data set of the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) II for a post hoc analysis. All patients had a control CT scan after 24 to 96 hours or earlier in case of rapid and severe clinical deterioration. HT was categorized according to radiological criteria: hemorrhagic infarction type 1 and type 2 and parenchymal hematoma type 1 and type 2. The clinical course was prospectively documented with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and the modified Rankin Scale. The independent risk of each type of HT was calculated for clinical deterioration at 24 hours and disability and death at 3 months after stroke onset and adjusted for possible confounding factors such as age, severity of stroke syndrome at baseline, and extent of the ischemic lesion on the initial CT.

Results—Compared with absence of HT, only parenchymal hematoma type 2 was associated with an increased risk for deterioration at 24 hours after stroke onset (adjusted odds ratio, 18; 95% CI, 6 to 56) and for death at 3 months (adjusted odds ratio, 11; 95% CI, 3.7 to 36). All other types of HT did not independently increase the risk of late deterioration.

Conclusions—Only parenchymal hematoma type 2 independently causes clinical deterioration and impairs prognosis. It has a distinct radiological feature: it is a dense homogeneous hematoma >30% of the ischemic lesion volume with significant space-occupying effect.

  • hematoma
  • hemorrhagic stroke
  • stroke outcome
  • thrombolysis

Several large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke have been conducted during the past years. Secondary hemorrhagic transformations (HT) after different types of thrombolytic therapy are frequently reported as important safety parameters in these studies, but they also occur as natural events in the evolution of a cerebral infarct.1 2 3 4 The increase of HT in the actively treated arm is often used as evidence against the treatment tested, as reported in the early streptokinase trials, with a concurrent increase of mortality and HT in the actively treated groups.5 6 7 Although the large European and American tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) trials provided evidence of a benefit in ischemic stroke patients, the fear of hemorrhagic events frequently precludes the use of thrombolysis in clinical practice. Unfortunately, previous trials addressing safety and efficacy of thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke applied different definitions for the term symptomatic hemorrhage or symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation. In the tPA trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS),8 9 symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was defined as “any CT-documented hemorrhage that was temporally related to deterioration in the patient’s clinical condition in the judgment of the clinical investigator,” no matter how trivial the hemorrhage on the CT scan might have been. In addition, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage attributable to study medication was defined as “symptomatic hemorrhage that occurred within 36 hours from treatment onset.” In the Multicenter Acute Stroke Trial of Italy and Europe,6 7 symptomatic HT was defined as “clinical deterioration temporally related to HT documented by CT-scan or autopsy.” A CT scan was regularly obtained at 5 days after stroke onset or earlier in the event of clinical deterioration. Further studies continued to apply the term symptomatic hemorrhage according to the NINDS protocol9 10 11 or without a definition.12 13

The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) I and II14 15 went in the opposite direction and used a pure radiological, prospective definition: HT were categorized into 4 different subtypes without taking into consideration whether or not any hemorrhage was associated with clinical deterioration. In addition to the pure radiological definition, the category of symptomatic hemorrhage was used for patients with clinical deterioration by ≥4 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and with no CT findings that might have been responsible for this deterioration other than a hemorrhage.

Fiorelli et al16 recently demonstrated on the basis of the ECASS I data that, in both the placebo and the rtPA groups, only parenchymal hematomas (PH) >30% of the infarcted area with significant space-occupying effect increased the risk of early neurological deterioration and of 3-month death. Hemorrhagic infarctions (HI) or PH with only mild space-occupying effect did not modify the risk of early neurological deterioration, death, and disability. The different clinical outcome after different subtypes of HT illustrates the difficulty in defining symptomatic hemorrhage precisely and clearly. In fact, the spectrum of HTs differs widely and may include some trivial hemorrhagic petechiae as well as PH with space-occupying effect. To determine whether any neurological deterioration is due to HT itself or due to massive infarct and ischemic edema with a coincidental HT remains crucial in thrombolysis or other stroke trials. The aim of this study on the ECASS II data set was to define specific HT that are independently associated with an increased risk of clinical deterioration or worse outcome according to the hypothesis of Fiorelli et al.16 We sought to further assess the impact of possible confounding factors on clinical deterioration in patients with HT.

Subjects and Methods

The study design and primary results of ECASS II have been described in detail elsewhere.15 ECASS II was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating safety and efficacy of 0.9 mg/kg IV recombinant tPA (rtPA) in patients presenting within 6 hours from the onset of an acute hemispheric ischemic stroke. Intravenous heparin or oral anticoagulants within the first 24 hours were not allowed.

All patients were examined with CT scan before randomization and after 24 to 96 hours (median, 1 day; range, 0 to 4 days). Nine patients had their follow-up scan within 24 hours of stroke onset, 643 patients between 24 and 48 hours, 128 between 48 and 72 hours, and 3 between 72 and 96 hours. An additional CT was performed after 1 week. We used this CT for analysis in 6 patients in whom the first follow-up CT was not available. Following the prospective ECASS protocol, all CT scans were evaluated twice, first by the local investigators and then independently by 3 members of the CT reading panel. The members of the CT reading panel were blinded to treatment allocation, any clinical events occurring after randomization, and the reading of the local investigators and did not see follow-up scans before evaluating the baseline CT. After the exclusion of 10 patients (3 rtPA, 7 placebo) with CT scans of too poor quality to allow unequivocal assessment of HT, 790 of 800 randomized patients remained for the analysis. HT occurring on the first follow-up CT scan after randomization were prospectively categorized according to definitions previously described17 18 : HI and PH. HI type 1 (HI-1) was defined as small petechiae along the margins of the infarct, and HI type 2 (HI-2) was defined as more confluent petechiae within the infarcted area but without space-occupying effect. PH type 1 (PH-1) was defined as hematoma in ≤30% of the infarcted area with some slight space-occupying effect; PH type 2 (PH-2) was defined as dense hematoma >30% of the infarcted area with substantial space-occupying effect or as any hemorrhagic lesion outside the infarcted area (examples are shown in Figure 1⇓). In cases of >1 hemorrhagic lesion on CT scan, the worst possible HT category was assumed.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Examples of different subtypes of HT: HI-1 with scattered, heterogeneous petechiae along the margins of the infarct (A); HI-2 with more confluent but still heterogeneous petechiae within the infarcted area (B); PH-1 with a homogeneous hematoma covering <30% of the infarcted area and only mild space-occupying effect (C); and PH-2 with a dense hematoma >30% of the lesion volume with significant space-occupying effect (D).

Baseline and follow-up CT scans were obtained nonenhanced and on the same scanner if possible. Windows and center levels were set to optimally distinguish gray and white matter. The study protocol recommended a window width of 80 to 100 Hounsfield units and a center level of 30 to 40 Hounsfield units. The chairman of the CT reading panel gathered the categorized findings from the panel members, checked them for disagreements, disclosed disagreements to the other panel members, and discussed each discrepant CT to achieve consensus. The final judgments were sent to the data management center, which then was allowed to send the follow-up scans to the members of the CT reading panel. We defined hypoattenuation as a visible decrease in x-ray attenuation of brain tissue compared with other portions of the same anatomic structure or its contralateral counterpart. We categorized the extent of hypoattenuation of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory as none, ≤33% (small), and >33% (large).19 20 The total MCA territory was considered the brain volume between 2 lines being drawn from the anterior horn of the ventricle and from the trigonum perpendicular to the skull involving most parts of the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobe with the exception of the parasagittal structures. On follow-up CT scans, we measured the volume of acute ischemic lesions by multiplying the maximum diameter of hypoattenuation, maximum diameter perpendicular to it in the same slice, number of slices affected, slice distance, and a conversion factor of 0.5 using the formula for irregular volumes. In patients with HT, the entire ischemic and hemorrhagic lesion was measured.

From the ECASS II database, we retrieved the following variables: age, sex, allocation to placebo/rtPA treatment, severity of neurological deficit on admission as quantified with the NIHSS and the Scandinavian Stroke Scale,21 NIHSS score 24±2 hours after stroke onset, extent of initial ischemic lesion on baseline CT scan (none, ≤33% of MCA territory, and >33% of MCA territory), body temperature, blood glucose, and blood pressure at the inclusion time. We calculated the frequencies of the different subtypes of HT for placebo and rtPA groups. Statistical difference was tested with the χ2 test.

To examine which of the collected variables accounted for clinical deterioration 24 hours after stroke onset (increase in NIHSS score by ≥4 between baseline and after 24±2 hours22 according to the prospective definition used in ECASS II), for disability and death at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale score >2), and for death up to 3 months after stroke onset, we performed a logistic regression analysis on each of these variables. Variables with a P>0.05 in the Wald test and the logistic likelihood ratio test were assumed to be irrelevant for the outcome tested and were excluded from further analysis. We calculated the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for each HT subtype, comparing the ORs of each level of HT with no HT. Subsequently, we performed a multiple regression analysis including all variables considered relevant factors from the univariate analysis and calculated ORs for clinical deterioration at 24 hours, disability and death after 3 months, and death at 3 months after stroke onset. In a backward stepwise regression, we excluded all variables from our model that did not contribute significantly in at least 1 outcome test. The adjusted ORs are given for all variables finally kept in the model. Variables leading to a clear change of the ORs for HT were considered confounding factors.

Finally, we evaluated the relationship between the frequency of PH-2 and the extent of hypoattenuation on baseline CT scan and calculated ORs for the development of PH-2. The Newman-Keuls test was applied to assess the relationship between incidence of different types of HT and the lesion volume at 24 hours. In all tests, a statistical significance was assumed for P<0.05. Analyses were performed with StatView statistical software (edition 5.0.1).

Results

Of a total of 790 intent-to-treat patients in ECASS II, 406 patients received rtPA (0.9 mg/kg), and 384 patients were treated with placebo. In the first follow-up CT scan, significantly more HT occurred in the rtPA group: 29.5% versus 18.5% in the placebo group (Table 1⇓). This was mainly due to a higher incidence of PH-2 in the rtPA group (7.6% versus 0.5%; P<0.0001). The incidences of HI-1, HI-2, and PH-1 were statistically not different between the placebo and the actively treated group, although there was a clear trend for HI-2 and PH-1 to more likely occur after thrombolysis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Frequencies of Different Types of Hemorrhage in the Placebo and rtPA Groups

Table 2⇓ presents the unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios for the 4 different types of HT and for other factors found to contribute significantly to outcome. Sex, body temperature, and blood pressure at the inclusion time were irrelevant for outcome and thus were excluded from analysis. PH-2 significantly increased the risk of early deterioration, of disability and death at 3 months, and of death at 3 months alone. PH-1 accounted for an increased risk of early deterioration but not of disability or death at 3 months. Thus, outcome at 3 months was modified only by presence of PH-2 on the first follow-up CT scan. In our search for factors contributing significantly to outcome, we found a confounding effect of severity of stroke syndrome at onset and of presence of hypodensity >33% on baseline CT scan. Both were associated with an increased risk rate for disability and death. Presence of a large hypodensity was associated with early deterioration. Other contributing factors for outcome were age and glucose level. Increase of age or glucose was associated with an increased risk of disability and death at 3 months. Treatment with rtPA led to a significantly decreased risk of disability or death after 3 months; however, its influence for early deterioration or death alone at 3 months was insignificant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Comparison of Adjusted and Unadjusted ORs

Figure 2⇓ demonstrates the positive correlation between large lesion volumes and large PH in both the actively treated and the placebo-treated groups. In both treatment groups, the total lesion volumes in patients with PH-2 were significantly larger than those of all other groups, including the group without HT. Thus, the space-occupying effect of PH-2 becomes evident. Table 3⇓ presents the relationship between incidence of PH-2 and extent of hypoattenuation on baseline CT scan. Clearly, the incidence of PH-2 is more frequent with presence of large hypodensity on CT scan. The risk ratio of developing PH-2 with an initially large extent of the ischemic lesion was 4.4.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Comparison between lesion volume and presence of hemorrhage, showing mean lesion volume (error bars indicate SD) and corresponding group of patients with a certain type of HT or without any HT. In both treatment groups, significant difference in lesion volume was reached between PH-2 and all other groups, including the group without any HT. In the rtPA group, lesion volume in patients without HT was also significantly lower than in patients with HI-1 and HI-2 (Newman-Keuls test). See Table 1⇑ for frequencies of different HT subtypes.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Observed Frequencies of PH-2 With Different Extents of Hypoattenuation on Baseline CT Scan and Their ORs for the Development of PH-2

Discussion

HT of a brain infarct is a major concern when thrombolysis is used in acute stroke. Frequently, HT of any type and extent found on routine follow-up CT scans is considered a serious adverse event and is often termed symptomatic hemorrhage regardless of whether a certain type of HT was really causing symptoms. In the larger thrombolysis studies, various definitions for symptomatic hemorrhage consisting of radiological and clinical criteria were applied. The NINDS tPA trial defined symptomatic hemorrhage as “any CT-documented hemorrhage that was temporally related to deterioration in the patient’s clinical condition in the judgment of the clinical investigator.”8 Symptomatic hemorrhage was considered to be due to study medication if it occurred within 36 hours of treatment. It appears inconceivable that a clinical deterioration under this definition could not be merely coincidental with any HT appearing on CT scan. In fact, the deterioration could well have been the natural course of a stroke independent of the coinciding HT, especially if the HT was only a minor part of a large infarct. In a post hoc analysis by the NINDS Stroke Study Group,9 it was nevertheless stated that presence of a severe neurological deficit and clear signs of brain edema or mass effect on pretreatment CT increased the risk of symptomatic hemorrhage. Again, pure radiological criteria of different types of HT were not considered, and other factors causing clinical deterioration were ignored. Similar definitions for symptomatic hemorrhage were applied in the Multicenter Acute Stroke Trial of Italy and Europe6 7 and in recent thrombolysis surveys.10 11

In ECASS I and II, prospective radiological definitions of the 4 different subtypes of HT were applied regardless of clinical events, and CT scans with or without HT were analyzed regardless of clinical data. CT was performed at 24 hours and 7 days after symptom onset and treatment and in case of clinical deterioration. Almost all major hemorrhages were detected by the first follow-up CT. However, local investigators collecting data on neurological status might have created some unavoidable bias in that they knew the result of the CT scan and might have implemented a preconceived notion of any relationship between HT and neurological deterioration. We believe that a prospective protocol for CT scanning at predetermined dates is necessary to study the question of whether certain types of hemorrhage are associated with clinical deterioration. In our view, an early follow-up CT within 48 hours of treatment is necessary to detect hemorrhages caused by rtPA.

In this post hoc analysis of the ECASS II data set, we confirm previous results by Fiorelli et al16 that only PH >30% of the infarcted area with considerable space-occupying effect (PH-2) significantly increased the risk of early clinical deterioration and of a worse long-term outcome, including death. Other types of HT, particularly HI-1 and HI-2, were not associated with clinical deterioration. This was also true for PH-1, which at least did not increase the risk of disability or death up to 3 months after stroke onset. Thus, while these latter types of HT would have been termed symptomatic hemorrhages according to the definition of many ongoing trials, their presence might not have been responsible for deterioration. Instead, other factors such as age, initial glucose level, extent of initial hypodensity on baseline CT scan, and severity of stroke syndrome at baseline additionally contributed to clinical outcome, as described in a previous study.23 Treatment with rtPA, although associated with a higher incidence of PH-2, decreased the overall risk of disability and death at 3 months.

In particular, stroke severity and the presence of large hypodensity on the initial CT scan were associated with a significantly increased risk for disability and death up to 3 months after stroke onset. Thus, they appear as confounding factors for the influence of HT on outcome. After adjustment for these confounding factors, the risk for disability or death at 3 months was increased insignificantly after PH-2, but with respect to a long-term outcome, PH-2 independently and significantly increased only the risk of death at 3 months. HI-1 was even associated with some clinical improvement and may, at least in this early stage, indicate the effect of successful early reperfusion. Since PH-2 is of major clinical relevance or may in fact be considered hemorrhage that is most likely to be symptomatic, emphasis must be placed on the recognition of stroke patients who are more likely to develop large PH and subsequently should be excluded from thrombolysis. PH-2 occurred more frequently in patients with hypodensity >33% on early CT. These early ischemic changes identified on the pretreatment CT represent early cytotoxic edema and possibly the development of irreversible injury.24 In a study by Hamann et al,25 the presence of microscopic hemorrhages in the ischemic area has been related to a loss of cerebrovascular basal lamina integrity. Since these microscopic hemorrhages always occur within the infarcted area, particularly in the subcortical core, a large infarct volume a priori offers a larger area of lost basal lamina integrity, thus possibly leading more frequently to parenchymal hemorrhages. We were able to confirm this relationship by demonstrating a positive correlation between large lesion volume and presence of PH-2. Thus, to detect signs of early infarction on CT remains crucial, although it is questioned whether these signs can be detected reliably.26 In a previous study the interobserver agreement in assessing subtle CT signs of cerebral infarction was moderate to substantial.20 Similar results for assessment of the hypoattenuation in thirds of the MCA territory were obtained by the Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS) study group.27 Whether general reading of CT scans can be improved by quantification and division of the MCA territory into many regions of interest remains to be confirmed in clinical practice. To date, presence of hypoattenuation larger than one third of the MCA territory on baseline CT seems to be the most simple and readily available predictor of the development of large PH.

In summary, only large PH >30% of the infarcted area with space-occupying effect (PH-2) independently modify the risk of a worse clinical outcome both early and late after stroke onset. Smaller but still homogeneous PH (PH-1) increase the risk of early deterioration but not of a worse long-term outcome. Heterogeneous, petechial HI are not associated with worse early or late outcome. Thus, the term symptomatic hemorrhage should be applied with caution because it implies a causal relationship between signs of HT found on CT and clinical deterioration. Additional factors, such as extent of the lesion, edema formation, and severity of the stroke syndrome, however, offer an explanation for a patient’s deterioration or bad outcome. In future reports dealing with safety aspects of thrombolysis, a clearer distinction between nonrelevant forms of HT and PH with risk of clinical deterioration should be made.

Acknowledgments

ECASS II was supported exclusively by Boehringer Ingelheim, Biberach, Germany.

  • Received October 26, 2000.
  • Revision received February 21, 2001.
  • Accepted February 22, 2001.
  • Copyright © 2001 by American Heart Association

References

  1. ↵
    Hornig CR, Dorndorf W, Agnoli AL. Hemorrhagic cerebral infarction: a prospective study. Stroke. 1986;17:179–185.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Bozzao L, Angeloni U, Bastianello S, Fantozzi LM, Pierallini A, Fieschi C. Early angiographic and CT findings in patients with hemorrhagic infarction in the distribution of the middle cerebral artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12:1115–1121.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Moulin T, Crepin-Leblond T, Chopard JL, Bogousslavsky J. Hemorrhagic infarcts. Eur Neurol. 1994;34:64–77.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Toni D, Fiorelli M, Bastianello S, Sacchetti ML, Sette G, Argentino C, Montinaro E, Bozzao L. Hemorrhagic transformation of brain infarct: predictability in the first 5 hours from stroke onset and influence on clinical outcome. Neurology. 1996;46:341–345.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Donnan GA, Davis SM, Chambers BR, Gates PC, Hankey GJ, McNeil JJ, Rosen D, Stewart-Wynne EG, Tuck RR, for the Australian Streptokinase (ASK) Trial Study Group. Streptokinase for acute ischemic stroke with relationship to time of administration. JAMA. 1996;276:961–966.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    . The Multicentre Acute Stroke Trial–Italy Group (MAST-I). Randomised controlled trial of streptokinase, aspirin, and combination of both in treatment of acute ischaemic stroke Lancet. 1995;346:1509–1514.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    The Multicenter Acute Stroke Trial–Europe (MAST-E). Thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase in acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:145–150.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–1587.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    The NINDS t-PA Stroke Study Group. Intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous t-PA therapy for ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:2109–2118.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Tanne D, Bates VE, Verro P, Kasner SE, Binder JR, Patel SC, Mansbach HH, Daley S, Schultz LR, Karanjia PN, Scott P, Dayno JM, Vereczkey-Porter K, Benesch C, Book D, Coplin WM, Dulli D, Levine SR, for the t-PA Stroke Survey Group. Initial clinical experience with IV tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter survey. Neurology. 1999;53:424–427.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Buchan AM, Barber PA, Newcommon N, Karbalai HG, Demchuk AM, Hoyte KM, Klein GM, Feasby TE. Effectiveness of t-PA in acute ischemic stroke: outcome relates to appropriateness. Neurology. 2000;54:679–684.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Chiu D, Krieger D, Villar-Cordova C, Kasner SE, Morgenstern LB, Bratina PL, Yatsu FM, Grotta JC. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke: feasibility, safety, and efficacy in the first year of clinical practice. Stroke. 1998;29:18–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Gonner F, Remonda L, Mattle H, Sturzenegger M, Ozdoba C, Lovblad KO, Baumgartner R, Bassetti C, Schroth G. Local intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1998;29:1894–1900.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, Lesaffre E, von Kummer R, Boysen G, Bluhmki E, Hoxter G, Mahagne MH, et al, for the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke. JAMA. 1995;274:1017–1025.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, von Kummer R, Davalos A, Meier D, Larrue V, Bluhmki E, Davis S, Donnan G, Schneider D, Diez-Tejedor E, Trouillas P, for the Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Lancet. 1998;352:1245–1251.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Fiorelli M, Bastianello S, von Kummer R, del Zoppo GJ, Larrue V, Lesaffre E, Ringleb AP, Lorenzano S, Manelfe C, Bozzao L. Hemorrhagic transformation within 36 hours of a cerebral infarct: relationships with early clinical deterioration and 3-month outcome in the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study I (ECASS I) cohort. Stroke. 1999;30:2280–2284.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Pessin MS, del Zoppo GJ, Estol CJ. Thrombolytic agents in the treatment of stroke. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1990;13:271–289.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    Wolpert SM, Bruckmann H, Greenlee R, Wechsler L, Pessin MS, del Zoppo GJ, for the rt-PA Acute Stroke Study Group. Neuroradiologic evaluation of patients with acute stroke treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1993;14:3–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    von Kummer R, Allen KL, Holle R, Bozzao L, Bastianello S, Manelfe C, Bluhmki E, Ringleb P, Meier DH, Hacke W. Acute stroke: usefulness of early CT findings before thrombolytic therapy. Radiology. 1997;205:327–333.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    von Kummer R, Holle R, Gizyska U, Hofmann E, Jansen O, Petersen D, Schumacher M, Sartor K. Interobserver agreement in assessing early CT signs of middle cerebral artery infarction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17:1743–1748.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  21. ↵
    The Scandinavian Stroke Study Group. Multicenter trial of hemodilution in ischemic stroke: background and study protocol. Stroke. 1985;16:885–890.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Brott TG, Haley EC Jr, Levy DE, Barsan W, Broderick J, Sheppard GL, Spilker J, Kongable GL, Massey S, Reed R, Marler JR. Urgent therapy for stroke, part I: pilot study of tissue plasminogen activator administered within 90 minutes. Stroke. 1992;23:632–640.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Larrue V, von Kummer R, del Zoppo G, Bluhmki E. Hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke: potential contributing factors in the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study. Stroke. 1997;28:957–960.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    del Zoppo GJ, von Kummer R, Hamann GF. Ischaemic damage of brain microvessels: inherent risks for thrombolytic treatment in stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;65:1–9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Hamann GF, Okada Y, del Zoppo GJ. Hemorrhagic transformation and microvascular integrity during focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996;16:1373–1378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Wardlaw JM, Dorman PJ, Lewis SC, Sandercock PA. Can stroke physicians and neuroradiologists identify signs of early cerebral infarction on CT? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;67:651–653.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Zhang J, Buchan AM, for the ASPECTS Study Group (Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score). Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. Lancet. 2000;355:1670–1674.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Subjects and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Stroke
June 2001, Volume 32, Issue 6
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Subjects and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Hemorrhagic Transformation of Ischemic Brain Tissue
    Christian Berger, Marco Fiorelli, Thorsten Steiner, Wolf-Rüdiger Schäbitz, Luigi Bozzao, Erich Bluhmki, Werner Hacke and Rüdiger von Kummer
    Stroke. 2001;32:1330-1335, originally published June 1, 2001
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.32.6.1330

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Stroke.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Hemorrhagic Transformation of Ischemic Brain Tissue
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Stroke
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Stroke web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Hemorrhagic Transformation of Ischemic Brain Tissue
    Christian Berger, Marco Fiorelli, Thorsten Steiner, Wolf-Rüdiger Schäbitz, Luigi Bozzao, Erich Bluhmki, Werner Hacke and Rüdiger von Kummer
    Stroke. 2001;32:1330-1335, originally published June 1, 2001
    https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.32.6.1330
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Treatment
  • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Computerized Tomography (CT)
  • Stroke
    • Ischemic Stroke
    • Intracranial Hemorrhage

Stroke

  • About Stroke
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Stroke CME
  • Guidelines and Statements
  • Meeting Abstracts
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
200 5th Avenue
Suite 1020
Waltham, MA 02451
email: stroke@strokeahajournal.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured